ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2021
Diagnostic accuracy of the Berlin questionnaire and therapeutic effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in OSAHS patients with glucose metabolic dysfunction.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intermittent Hypoxia Impairs Cognitive Function and Promotes Mitophagy and Lysophagy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Rat Model.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Advances in immunology of obstructive sleep apnea: mechanistic insights, clinical impact, and therapeutic perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Changes of circulating biomarkers of inflammation and glycolipid metabolism by CPAP in OSA patients: a meta-analysis of time-dependent profiles.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022Article
- NLRP3 Deficiency Protects Against Intermittent Hypoxia-Induced Neuroinflammation and Mitochondrial ROS by Promoting the PINK1-Parkin Pathway of Mitophagy in a Murine Model of Sleep Apnea.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeObstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is associated with alterations in glucose metabolism. The Berlin questionnaire (BQ) is effective in identifying subjects with high risk of OSAHS. However, its validity in patients with glucose metabolic dysfunction remains unclear. Our study aims to examine the diagnostic efficacy of the BQ in detecting OSAHS in patients with glucose metabolic dysfunction and to explore the effect of nasal CPAP on glucose metabolism.
methodsPatients with glucose metabolic dysregulation were first asked to complete the BQ and then recruited for polysomnogram (PSG). The diagnostic accuracy of the BQ and the relationships between groups with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), elevated fasting blood glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and diabetes mellitus (DM) were analyzed. Subjects with both OSAHS and glucose dysregulation received CPAP treatment and underwent an oral glucose tolerance test. Changes in apnea-hypopnea indices (AHI) and glycemic parameters were calculated to determine the efficacy of CPAP.
resultsGlycosylated hemoglobin and insulin levels were statistically different between the high-risk and low-risk groups according to the BQ. For diagnosis of subjects with OSAHS who also had glucose metabolic dysfunction, the sensitivity and specificity of the BQ using AHI cut-off values at 5 events per hour were 73% and 67%. CPAP therapy effectively reduced the blood glucose, HOMA-IR, and insulin levels.
conclusionsThe BQ can be considered to be an effective and economical screening tool for patieints with OSAHS who also have glucose metabolic dysfunction. Treatment with CPAP may improve glycemic parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.