ArticleMolecular biology reports2020
MLST based serotype prediction for the accurate identification of non typhoidal Salmonella serovars.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole genome-sequence-based molecular characterisation of Salmonella Kentucky co-resistant to fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins isolated from children during 2017 to 2024: emergence of blaBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Rethinking the fight against pig-related human salmonellosis in the European union.Porcine health management · 2025Review
- Genotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas veronii isolated from aquatic animals in Sichuan, China.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Development of a Molecular Serotyping Scheme forFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- A nineteen-year report of serotype and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric non-typhoidalGut pathogens · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional serotyping based on the phenotypic variation of O- and H-antigen remains as the gold-standard for the identification and classification of Salmonella isolates for last 70 years. Although this classification is a globally recognized nomenclature, huge diversity of Salmonella serotypes have made the serovar identification to be very complex. Seven gene multilocus sequence typing (MLST) on the other hand can provide serovar prediction as well as the evolutionary origin between the serovars. In this study non typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) strains (n = 45) isolated from clinical samples (blood, faeces and pus) were identified by traditional phenotypic serotyping and biochemical testing. All the tested Salmonella isolates were designated as serovar Typhimurium based on phenotyping. However, by MLST 60% (27/45) of the isolates were S. Typhimurium, 35.5% (16/45) were S. Agona (ST13), 2.2% (1/45) were S. Kentucky (ST198) and 2.2% (1/45) were S. Saintpaul (ST27). MLST analysis assigned S. Typhimurium isolates as ST36 (18/127), ST19 (7/27) and ST313 (2/27). Mismatches in serovar designation between MLST database and phenotypic serotyping can be due to the misinterpretation of phenotypic serotyping as the antigenic structures of S. Typhimurium, S. Agona differs by a surface antigen. MLST based phylogeny of study isolates showed clustering according to sequence types. Concordance between MLST based sequence type and phenotypic serotype is important to provide insights into genetic population structure of Salmonella.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.