SynthesisPediatric surgery international2020
Comparison of clinical outcomes between ABO-incompatible and ABO-compatible pediatric liver transplantation: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Outcomes of ABO-Incompatible Versus ABO-Compatible Liver Transplantation in Pediatric Recipients: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Pooled it
- A Retrospective Study of Long-Term Outcomes in 16 ABO-Incompatible Deceased Donor Pediatric Liver Transplants from a National Transplant Center at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, 1987-2022.Annals of transplantation · 2024Article
- Pediatric liver transplantation outcomes from a single center in Thailand.World journal of hepatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeABO-incompatible (ABO-i) liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving method for pediatric patients in emergency situations that has the potential to expand the pool of liver donors. However, the risks of ABO-i compared to ABO-compatible (ABO-c) LT are unclear. To address this clinical uncertainty, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes between ABO-i and ABO-c LT in pediatric patients.
methodsA systematic search for studies comparing outcomes between ABO-i and ABO-c LT was performed in the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases through May 2020. Outcomes evaluated included graft survival rate, patient survival rate, rejection, infection, biliary complications, and vascular complications. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using RevMan 5.3.
resultsA total of 12 studies involving 7461 patients were included in the review. Meta-analysis of these studies showed significantly lower 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year graft survival rates for ABO-i vs. ABO-c LT (1 year: OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.59, P < 0.00001; 3 years: OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.36-0.63, P < 0.00001; 5 year: OR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.37-0.63, P < 0.00001) as well as significantly lower 1 year, 3 year, 5 year, and 10 year patient survival rates for ABO-i vs. ABO-c (1 year: OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.24-0.49, P < 0.00001; 3 years: OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.14-0.40, P < 0.00001; 5 years: OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.64, P < 0.00001; 10 years: OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.90, P = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between the groups in incidence of cytomegalovirus infection, acute cellular rejection, acute rejection, biliary complications, or hepatic artery thrombosis.
conclusionsOur systematic review and meta-analysis showed consistently lower patient survival and graft survival in pediatric ABO-i LT compared to ABO-c LT. However, ABO-i LT is still a life-saving emergency option for pediatric patients waiting for a suitable liver source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33001256What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.