ArticleJAMA network open2020
Evaluation of US State-Level Variation in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Acromegaly and pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pituitary · 2022Pooled it
- Eclampsia and early readmission for cardiovascular disease.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Explaining Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Hypertension and Diabetes during Pregnancy in the United States (2016-2022): A Decomposition Analysis.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Association of Early-life Trauma With Gestational Diabetes and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Factors affecting the place of death in patients with liver cancer in China, 2013-2020: A population-based study.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025Article
- Identification of Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy in Three Administrative Data Sources Among Medicaid-Funded Births in California.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2024Article
- The association between maternal insurance status on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Journal of human hypertension · 2024Article
- Increased risk of severe COVID-19 in pregnancy in a multicenter propensity score-matched study.Journal of perinatal medicine · 2023Review
- Reproductive Healthcare Access and the Cardiologist's Role Addressing Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Cardiovascular Risk.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Variation in Hypertension in Pregnancy by State Restrictions on Abortion.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Cellular Immunotherapy in Mice Prevents Maternal Hypertension and Restores Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Balance in Maternal and Fetal Tissues.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes and Perinatal Health: A Quasi-Experimental Study.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023Article
- County incidence and geospatial trends of early-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Kentucky, 2008-2017.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Neonatal Depression Is Associated With 1-Year Mortality in Critical Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Validation of a Remote Monitoring Blood Pressure Device in Pregnancy.American journal of hypertension · 2023Article
- Associations between Air Pollution Exposure and Blood Pressure during Pregnancy among PRINCESA Cohort Participants.Toxics · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Disease-Related Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization among Women with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.American journal of preventive medicine · 2023Article
- Placental cell type deconvolution reveals that cell proportions drive preeclampsia gene expression differences.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Association of adverse pregnancy outcomes and multiple gestation with natural menopause: A population-based cohort study.Maturitas · 2023Article
- Pre-pregnancy Diabetes, Pre-pregnancy Hypertension and Prenatal Care Timing among Women in the United States, 2018.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are important causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity in the US. However, the extent of statewide variation in the prevalence of chronic hypertension, pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia, and eclampsia in the US remains unknown. Objective: To examine the extent of statewide variation in the prevalence of chronic hypertension, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (including pregnancy-induced hypertension or preeclampsia), and eclampsia in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional study using 2017 US birth certificate data was conducted from September 1, 2019, to February 1, 2020. A population-based sample of 3 659 553 women with a live birth delivery was included. Main Outcomes and Measures: State-specific prevalence of chronic hypertension, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and eclampsia was assessed using multilevel multivariable logistic regression, with the median odds ratio (MOR) to evaluate statewide variation. Results: Of the 3 659 553 women, 185 932 women (5.1%) were younger than 20 years, 727 573 women (19.9%) were aged between 20 and 24 years, 1 069 647 women (29.2%) were aged between 25 and 29 years, 1 037 307 women (28.3%) were aged between 30 and 34 years, 523 607 women (14.3%) were aged between 35 and 39 years, and 115 487 women (3.2%) were 40 years or older. Most women had Medicaid (42.8%) or private insurance (49.4%). Hawaii had the lowest adjusted prevalence of chronic hypertension (1.0%; 95% CI, 0.9%-1.2%), and Alaska had the highest (3.4%; 95% CI, 3.0%-3.9%). Massachusetts had the lowest adjusted prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (4.3%; 95% CI, 4.1%-4.6%), and Louisiana had the highest (9.3%; 95% CI, 8.9%-9.8%). Delaware had the lowest adjusted prevalence of eclampsia (0.03%; 95% CI, 0.01%-0.09%), and Hawaii had the highest (2.8%; 95% CI, 2.2%-3.4%). The degree of statewide variation was high for eclampsia (MOR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.88-2.82), indicating that the median odds of eclampsia were 2.4-fold higher if the same woman delivered in a US state with a higher vs lower prevalence of eclampsia. Modest variation between states was observed for chronic hypertension (MOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.20-1.33) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (MOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13-1.21). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that after accounting for patient-level and state-level variables, substantial state-level variation exists in the prevalence of eclampsia. These data can inform future public-health inquiries to identify reasons for the eclampsia variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.