Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33001187›Full record

ArticleClinical chemistry2020

Identifying Optimal Loci for the Molecular Diagnosis of Microsatellite Instability.

Dustin R Long, Adam Waalkes, Varun P Panicker, Ronald J Hause, Stephen J Salipante

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. MLH1 Loss in Primary Prostate Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrative Genomic Tests in Clinical Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dustin R LongDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Adam WaalkesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Varun P PanickerDepartment of Information Management, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Ronald J HauseDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Stephen J SalipanteDepartment of Information Management, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine Training GrantT32GM086270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Tonya M Palermo · 2009 to 2026
$4.3M
Advanced development and validation of genome-scale molecular diagnostics for microsatelliteinstability using targeted molecular counting methodsR33CA222344 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SALIPANTE, STEPHEN J · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA222344NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI) predicts oncological response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapies. Although microsatellite mutation is pathognomonic for the condition, loci have unequal diagnostic value for predicting MSI within and across cancer types.

methodsTo better inform molecular diagnosis of MSI, we examined 9438 tumor-normal exome pairs and 901 whole genome sequence pairs from 32 different cancer types and cataloged genome-wide microsatellite instability events. Using a statistical framework, we identified microsatellite mutations that were predictive of MSI within and across cancer types. The diagnostic accuracy of different subsets of maximally informative markers was estimated computationally using a dedicated validation set.

resultsTwenty-five cancer types exhibited hypermutated states consistent with MSI. Recurrently mutated microsatellites associated with MSI were identifiable in 15 cancer types, but were largely specific to individual cancer types. Cancer-specific microsatellite panels of 1 to 7 loci were needed to attain ≥95% diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for 11 cancer types, and in 8 of the cancer types, 100% sensitivity and specificity were achieved. Breast cancer required 800 loci to achieve comparable performance. We were unable to identify recurrent microsatellite mutations supporting reliable MSI diagnosis in ovarian tumors. Features associated with informative microsatellites were cataloged.

conclusionsMost microsatellites informative for MSI are specific to particular cancer types, requiring the use of tissue-specific loci for optimal diagnosis. Limited numbers of markers are needed to provide accurate MSI diagnosis in most tumor types, but it is challenging to diagnose breast and ovarian cancers using predefined microsatellite locus panels.

Indexed as

Genetic LociMicrosatellite InstabilityBiomarkers, TumorDNAExomeHumansMutationNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNAcancerimmunotherapymicrosatellite instabilitymismatch repairnext-generation DNA sequencingscreening

Identifiers

PMID33001187
PMCPMC7528407
OpenAlexW3088764530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.