ArticleClinical chemistry2020
Identifying Optimal Loci for the Molecular Diagnosis of Microsatellite Instability.
Article in Clinical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving the performance of polymerase chain reaction for microsatellite instability testing in endometrial cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- High Prevalence of Potential Molecular Therapeutic Targets in Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.Endocrine pathology · 2025Article
- Molecular subtype of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: an analysis of 80 Chinese patients using the TCGA molecular classification of endometrial cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- DNA damage response in breast cancer and its significant role in guiding novel precise therapies.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- Comparison of standard mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability tests in a large cancer series.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein deficiency: equal predictive markers?Pathology oncology research : POR · 2024Review
- Review
- MLH1 Loss in Primary Prostate Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2023Article
- Microsatellite instability detection in breast cancer using drop-off droplet digital PCR.Oncogene · 2022Article
- Detection of microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status by targeted plasma-based genotyping in metastatic breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2022Article
- Integrative Genomic Tests in Clinical Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Identification and verification of the prognostic value of CUL7 in colon adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI) predicts oncological response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapies. Although microsatellite mutation is pathognomonic for the condition, loci have unequal diagnostic value for predicting MSI within and across cancer types.
methodsTo better inform molecular diagnosis of MSI, we examined 9438 tumor-normal exome pairs and 901 whole genome sequence pairs from 32 different cancer types and cataloged genome-wide microsatellite instability events. Using a statistical framework, we identified microsatellite mutations that were predictive of MSI within and across cancer types. The diagnostic accuracy of different subsets of maximally informative markers was estimated computationally using a dedicated validation set.
resultsTwenty-five cancer types exhibited hypermutated states consistent with MSI. Recurrently mutated microsatellites associated with MSI were identifiable in 15 cancer types, but were largely specific to individual cancer types. Cancer-specific microsatellite panels of 1 to 7 loci were needed to attain ≥95% diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for 11 cancer types, and in 8 of the cancer types, 100% sensitivity and specificity were achieved. Breast cancer required 800 loci to achieve comparable performance. We were unable to identify recurrent microsatellite mutations supporting reliable MSI diagnosis in ovarian tumors. Features associated with informative microsatellites were cataloged.
conclusionsMost microsatellites informative for MSI are specific to particular cancer types, requiring the use of tissue-specific loci for optimal diagnosis. Limited numbers of markers are needed to provide accurate MSI diagnosis in most tumor types, but it is challenging to diagnose breast and ovarian cancers using predefined microsatellite locus panels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.