Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33001034›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2020

Understanding Medical Students' Attitudes Toward Learning eHealth: Questionnaire Study.

Kjeld Vossen, Jan-Joost Rethans, Sander M J van Kuijk, Cees P van der Vleuten, Pieter L Kubben

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kjeld VossenMaastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4537-1668
Jan-Joost RethansSkillslab, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-3014
Sander M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2796-729X
Cees P van der VleutenDepartment of Educational Development and Research, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-3119
Pieter L KubbenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8059-523X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral publications on research into eHealth demonstrate promising results. Prior researchers indicated that the current generation of doctors is not trained to take advantage of eHealth in clinical practice. Therefore, training and education for everyone using eHealth are key factors to its successful implementation. We set out to review whether medical students feel prepared to take advantage of eHealth innovations in medicine.

objectiveOur objective was to evaluate whether medical students desire a dedicated eHealth curriculum during their medical studies.

methodsA questionnaire assessing current education, the need for education about eHealth topics, and the didactical forms for teaching these topics was developed. Questionnaire items were scored on a scale from 1 (fully disagree with a topic) to 10 (fully agree with a topic). This questionnaire was distributed among 1468 medical students of Maastricht University in the Netherlands. R version 3.5.0 (The R Foundation) was used for all statistical procedures.

resultsA total of 303 students out of 1468, representing a response rate of 20.64%, replied to our questionnaire. The aggregate statement "I feel prepared to take advantage of the technological developments within the medical field" was scored at a mean value of 4.8 out of 10. Mean scores regarding the need for education about eHealth topics ranged from 6.4 to 7.3. Medical students did not favor creating their own health apps or mobile apps; the mean score was 4.9 for this topic. The most popular didactical option, with a mean score 7.2, was to remotely follow a real-life patient under the supervision of a doctor.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this is the largest evaluation of students' opinions on eHealth training in a medical undergraduate curriculum. We found that medical students have positives attitudes toward incorporating eHealth into the medical curriculum.

Indexed as

curriculumdigital skillseHealthmedical educationmedicinemHealthstudent opinionstudents

Identifiers

PMID33001034
PMCPMC7563623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.