Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000913›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2020

From general to specific: moving past the general population in the HIV response across sub-Saharan Africa.

Keletso Makofane, Elise M van der Elst, Jeffrey Walimbwa, Steave Nemande, Stefan D Baral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Keletso MakofaneFXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8493-4238
Elise M van der ElstKenya Medical Research Institute, Kilifi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-5106-0466
Jeffrey WalimbwaISHTAR MSM, Nairobi, Kenya.
Steave NemandeEvolve, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Stefan D BaralCenter for Public Health and Human Rights, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5482-2419

Funding

Validation of Stigma Metrics for Marginalized Men R01MH110358 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARAL, STEFAN DAVID · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110358NIMH NIH HHS R01MH110358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs the HIV field evolves to better serve populations which are diverse in risk and access to services, it is crucial to understand and adapt the conceptual tools used to make sense of the HIV pandemic. In this commentary, we discuss the concept of general population. Using a synthetic and historical review, we reflect on the genesis and usage of the general population in HIV research and programme literature, pointing to its moral connotations and its impact on epidemiologic reasoning. DISCUSSION: From the early days of the HIV pandemic, the category of general population has carried implicit normative meanings. General population represented those people considered to be undeserving of HIV acquisition, and therefore deserving of a response. Framing the HIV epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa as a generalized epidemic primarily affecting the general population has contributed to the exclusion of men who have sex with men from epidemic responses. The usage of this category has also masked heterogeneity among those it includes; the increasing focus on the use of interventions such as circumcision and HIV treatment as general population HIV prevention approaches has been marked by a lack of attention to heterogeneity among beneficiaries.

conclusionsWe recommend that the term general population be retired from the field's lexicon. HIV programmes should strengthen their capacity to describe the heterogeneity of those they serve and plan their interventions accordingly. To increase the efficiency and impact of the HIV response, it is urgent to stratify the category of general population by risk. Sexual networks are a promising basis for this stratification.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePandemicsPatient SelectionSexual BehaviorSocial NetworkingAfricageneral populationHIVkey and vulnerable populationsLGBT personsmen who have sex with men

Identifiers

PMID33000913
PMCPMC7527769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.