Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000411›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2021

Elevated Clozapine Concentrations in Clozapine-Treated Patients with Hypersalivation.

Georgios Schoretsanitis, Maxim Kuzin, John M Kane, Christoph Hiemke, Michael Paulzen, Ekkehard Haen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Georgios SchoretsanitisThe Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Behavioral Health Pavilion, 7559 263rd Street, Glen Oaks, NY, 11004, USA. george.schor@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3851-4117
Maxim Kuzin *Clienia Schloessli, Private Psychiatric Hospital and Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Zurich, Oetwil Am See, Zurich, Switzerland.
John M KaneThe Zucker Hillside Hospital, Psychiatry Research, Northwell Health, Behavioral Health Pavilion, 7559 263rd Street, Glen Oaks, NY, 11004, USA.
Christoph HiemkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Michael PaulzenAlexianer Hospital Aachen, Alexianergraben 33, 52062, Aachen, Germany.
Ekkehard HaenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Pharmacology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Northwell Health · USJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEJülich Aachen Research Alliance · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveHypersalivation is a common, clozapine-related adverse drug reaction with a serious impact on quality of life. Pharmacokinetic correlates of clozapine-related hypersalivation have evaded attention. The purpose of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between clozapine-treated patients with vs. without hypersalivation from a large therapeutic drug monitoring database.

methodsOut of a large therapeutic drug monitoring dataset of clozapine-treated patients, we compared a group of patients with hypersalivation (n = 72) and a control group of patients without any adverse reactions in this regard (n = 323). Comparisons included plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose as well as demographic characteristics between groups. Post-hoc analyses were performed separately in smokers and non-smokers. We used the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and the chi-square test, while effects of confounders were assessed using a bootstrapping analysis of covariance.

resultsPatients with hypersalivation had higher clozapine plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose (p < 0.001 for the Mann-Whitney U test in both cases). Groups did not differ regarding demographic characteristics except for clozapine daily dose and percentage of smokers (p = 0.005 for the Mann-Whitney U test and p = 0.028 for the chi-square test, respectively). There were fewer smokers across patients with hypersalivation compared with patients without and daily doses were higher in patients with hypersalivation. After analysis of covariance, differences remained for both plasma concentrations and concentrations-by-dose (p < 0.001 for both). Post hoc analyses in smokers and non-smokers separately reported similar findings.

conclusionsElevated clozapine plasma concentrations and higher concentrations-by-dose were observed in patients with hypersalivation. A potential role for therapeutic drug monitoring in the prevention or management of clozapine-related hypersalivation is suggested.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsClozapineSialorrheaDrug MonitoringHumansQuality of LifeAntipsychotic AgentsClozapine

Identifiers

PMID33000411
OpenAlexW3090916719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.