Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000341›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

Long-term outcomes of active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer in a community-based setting: results from a prospective non-interventional study.

Jan Herden, Andreas Schwarte, Thorsten Werner, Uwe Behrendt, Axel Heidenreich, Lothar Weissbach

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Article
  2. Important Studies Were not Mentioned.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Fifteen-year results of the ProtecT study-commentary].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan HerdenUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Reconstructive Urology, Cologne, Germany. jan.herden@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1667-5200
Andreas SchwarteUrological Practice Borken, Borken, Germany.
Thorsten WernerUrological Practice Herzberg, Herzberg Am Harz, Germany.
Uwe BehrendtUrological Practice Wittenbergplatz, Berlin, Germany.
Axel HeidenreichUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Reconstructive Urology, Cologne, Germany.
Lothar WeissbachHealth Research for Men GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEAlzChem (Germany) · DEPark-Klinik Birkenwerder · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report on long-term outcomes of patients treated with active surveillance (AS) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) in the daily routine setting.

methodsHAROW (2008-2013) was a non-interventional, health service research study about the management of localized PCa in the community setting, with 86% of the study centers being office-based urologists. A follow-up examination of all patients who opted for AS as primary treatment was carried out. Overall, cancer-specific, and metastasis-free survival, as well as discontinuation rates, were determined.

resultsOf 329 patients, 62.9% had very-low- and 21.3% low-risk tumours. The median follow-up was 7.7 years (IQR 4.7-9.1). Twenty-eight patients (8.5%) died unrelated to PCa, of whom 19 were under AS or watchful waiting (WW). Additionally, seven patients (2.1%) developed metastasis. The estimated 10-year overall and metastasis-free survival was 86% (95% CI 81.7-90.3) and 97% (95% CI 94.6-99.3), respectively. One hundred eighty-seven patients (56.8%) discontinued AS changing to invasive treatment: 104 radical prostatectomies (RP), 55 radiotherapies (RT), and 28 hormonal treatments (HT). Another 50 patients switched to WW. Finally, 37.4% remained alive without invasive therapy (22.2% AS and 15.2% WW). Intervention-free survival differed between the risk groups: 47.8% in the very-low-, 33.8% in the low- and 34.6% in the intermediate-/high-risk-group (p = 0.008). On multivariable analysis, PSA-density ≥ 0.2 ng/ml

conclusionEven in routine care, AS can be considered a safe treatment option. Our results might encourage office-based urologists regarding the implementation of AS and to counteract possible concerns against this treatment option.

Indexed as

Watchful WaitingAgedGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsPublic HealthTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeActive surveillanceConservative managementHAROW studyHealth service researchOutcomes researchRoutine care

Identifiers

PMID33000341
PMCPMC8332563
OpenAlexW3091354034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.