Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000337›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2020

In vitro diagnosis of resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to fipronil in Argentina.

Jorgelina Torrents, Nicolás Morel, Maria V Rossner, Norberto C Martínez, José R Toffaletti, Santiago Nava

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. In Vitro Larvicidal Efficacy of a Fipronil-Based Nanoixodicide AgainstTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
  4. The Role of Parasitoid Wasps,Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorgelina TorrentsFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Kreder 2805, CP 3080, Esperanza, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Nicolás MorelInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, CC 22, CP 2300, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Maria V RossnerInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez, Colonia Benítez, Chaco, Argentina.
Norberto C MartínezInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Agencia de Extensión Rural Garabato, Garabato, Santa Fe, Argentina.
José R ToffalettiInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria El Colorado, El Colorado, Formosa, Argentina.
Santiago NavaInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela, CC 22, CP 2300, Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina. nava.santiago@inta.gob.ar.

Funding

Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria PEI109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this work was to adapt and apply the in vitro larval bioassay packet test (LPT) to diagnose resistance of Rhipicephalus microplus ticks to fipronil in Argentina. Ten serial dilutions of fipronil were included in the LPT bioassay. Seven populations of R. microplus from six Argentinean Provinces were evaluated. Samples from Colonia Benítez, Quimilí and Intiyaco were unambiguously classified in the category 'resistant'. In all these cases the 95% confidence intervals did not overlap with that of the susceptible reference strain and the slope values were lower than the slope value obtained for the susceptible reference strain. The resistance ratio (RR

Indexed as

AcaricidesDrug ResistancePyrazolesRhipicephalusAnimalsArgentinaLarvaAcaricidesfipronilPyrazolesArgentinaBioassayFipronilResistanceTicks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.