Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000321›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2020

Enzymatic removal of inhibitory compounds from lignocellulosic hydrolysates for biomass to bioproducts applications.

Robson Tramontina, Lívia Beatriz Brenelli, Victoria Sodré, João Paulo Franco Cairo, Beatriz Medeiros Travália, Viviane Yoshimi Egawa, Rosana Goldbeck, Fabio Marcio Squina

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A LignocellulolyticJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Engineering the Oleaginous YeastFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robson TramontinaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biociências e Tecnologia de Produtos Bioativos (BTPB), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6265-733X
Lívia Beatriz BrenelliInterdisciplinary Center of Energy Planning (NIPE), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Victoria SodréPrograma de Processos Tecnológicos e Ambientais, Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO), Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2240-9128
João Paulo Franco CairoPrograma de Processos Tecnológicos e Ambientais, Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO), Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Beatriz Medeiros TraváliaSchool of Food Engineering, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-8258
Viviane Yoshimi EgawaSchool of Agriculture, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosana GoldbeckSchool of Food Engineering, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2953-8050
Fabio Marcio SquinaPrograma de Processos Tecnológicos e Ambientais, Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO), Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil. fabio.squina@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-7459
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade de Sorocaba · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 305748/2017-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 428527/2018-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/50590-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/07926-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/15477-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/18101-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physicochemical pretreatment is an important step to reduce biomass recalcitrance and facilitate further processing of plant lignocellulose into bioproducts. This process results in soluble and insoluble biomass fractions, and both may contain by-products that inhibit enzymatic biocatalysts and microbial fermentation. These fermentation inhibitory compounds (ICs) are produced during the degradation of lignin and sugars, resulting in phenolic and furanic compounds, and carboxylic acids. Therefore, detoxification steps may be required to improve lignocellulose conversion by microoganisms. Several physical and chemical methods, such as neutralization, use of activated charcoal and organic solvents, have been developed and recommended for removal of ICs. However, biological processes, especially enzyme-based, have been shown to efficiently remove ICs with the advantage of minimizing environmental issues since they are biogenic catalysts and used in low quantities. This review focuses on describing several enzymatic approaches to promote detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates and improve the performance of microbial fermentation for the generation of bioproducts. Novel strategies using classical carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZymes), such as laccases (AA1) and peroxidases (AA2), as well as more advanced strategies using prooxidant, antioxidant and detoxification enzymes (dubbed as PADs), i.e. superoxide dismutases, are discussed as perspectives in the field.

Indexed as

BiomassCarboxylic AcidsFermentationLaccaseLigninPeroxidasesSuperoxide DismutaseCarboxylic AcidsLaccaseLigninlignocellulosePeroxidasesSuperoxide DismutaseBiorefineryDetoxification enzymesFermentationInhibitory compoundsLigninLignocellulose

Identifiers

PMID33000321
OpenAlexW3091707608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.