Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000292›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2020

Expanded usage of the Challenge-Comet assay as a DNA repair biomarker in human populations: protocols for fresh and cryopreserved blood samples, and for different challenge agents.

Vanessa Valdiglesias, María Sánchez-Flores, Natalia Fernández-Bertólez, William Au, Eduardo Pásaro, Blanca Laffon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vanessa ValdiglesiasCentro de Investigaciones Científicas Avanzadas (CICA), Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidade da Coruña, Grupo DICOMOSA, Campus A Zapateira s/n, 15071, A Coruña, Spain. vvaldiglesias@udc.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5572-1089
María Sánchez-FloresAE CICA-INIBIC. Oza, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), 15071, A Coruña, Spain.
Natalia Fernández-BertólezAE CICA-INIBIC. Oza, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), 15071, A Coruña, Spain.
William AuUniversity of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology, Gheorghe Marinescu nr. 38, 540139, Targu Mures, Romania.
Eduardo PásaroAE CICA-INIBIC. Oza, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), 15071, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0650-8852
Blanca LaffonAE CICA-INIBIC. Oza, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), 15071, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-2599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deficiencies in DNA damage response and repair (DDRR) can cause serious pathological outcomes; therefore, having an ability to determine individual DDRR would enhance specificities in health risk assessment and in determining individual's response to cancer therapies. However, most methods for evaluating DDRR are not fully appropriate for population studies. The Challenge-Comet assay has gained acceptance for this purpose. The assay has traditionally used X-rays as challenge agent and isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as cell specimen. To enhance the usefulness of the assay, the objectives of this investigation were to use differently processed blood samples, to employ other challenge agents with different mechanisms of induction of DNA damage/repair, and to generate protocols for detecting different DDRR capacities. Fresh and frozen blood samples were challenged with bleomycin, methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and ultraviolet light. Significant induction of damage after all treatments, and progressive and time-dependent DDRR were observed. No significant differences were obtained in the DDRR capacities of fresh or frozen whole blood samples as compared to PBMC, except that fresh blood samples showed higher MMS-induced DDRR capacity than PBMC. Results from this study show that the Challenge-Comet assay can be used as routine biomarker of DDRR capacity in human biomonitoring studies, and that whole blood is also a useful biomatrix for this assay. The collected data allow us to recommend different protocols for the Challenge-Comet assay which are useful for evaluating DDRR capacities in several key DNA repair pathways. Consequently, the usefulness of the Challenge-Comet assay can be greatly expanded.

Indexed as

Biological MonitoringBlood Specimen CollectionComet AssayCryopreservationDNA DamageDNA RepairUltraviolet RaysAdultBiomarkersBleomycinFemaleHumansMethyl MethanesulfonateRisk AssessmentTime FactorsYoung AdultBiomarkersBleomycinMethyl MethanesulfonateBiomonitoringCellular repair assayChallenge-Comet assayDNA repairGenotoxicityHealth hazard assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.