Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000081›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A nationwide study.

Ryo Yamamoto, Masaru Suzuki, Tomohiro Funabiki, Yusho Nishida, Katsuya Maeshima, Junichi Sasaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in trauma patients: Past, present, and future.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. The role of REBOA in patients in traumatic cardiac arrest subsequent to hemorrhagic shock: a scoping review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. REBOA for trauma: Could we? Should we?Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryo YamamotoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Keio University School of Medicine Shinjuku Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8772-9600
Masaru SuzukiDepartment of Emergency Medicine Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital Ichikawa Chiba Japan.
Tomohiro FunabikiDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital Tsurumiku Yokohama Kanagawa Japan.
Yusho NishidaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Keio University School of Medicine Shinjuku Tokyo Japan.
Katsuya MaeshimaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Keio University School of Medicine Shinjuku Tokyo Japan.
Junichi SasakiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Keio University School of Medicine Shinjuku Tokyo Japan.
Keio University · JPTokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a less-invasive method for temporary hemostasis compared with cross-clamping the aorta through resuscitative thoracotomy (RT). Although the survival benefits of REBOA remained unclear, pathophysiological benefits were identified in patients with traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (t-OHCA). We examined the clinical outcomes of t-OHCA with the hypothesis that REBOA would be associated with higher survival to discharge compared with RT.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2004-2019). Adult patients with t-OHCA who had arrived without a palpable pulse and undergone aortic occlusion were included. Patients were divided into REBOA or RT groups, and propensity scores were developed using age, mechanism of injury, presence of signs of life, presence of severe head and/or chest injury, Injury Severity Score, and transportation time. Inverse probability weighting by propensity scores was performed to compare survival to discharge between the 2 groups.

resultsAmong 13,247 patients with t-OHCA, 1483 were included in this study. A total of 144 (9.7%) patients were treated with REBOA, and 5 of 144 (3.5%) in the REBOA group and 10 of 1339 (0.7%) in the RT group survived to discharge. The use of REBOA was significantly associated with increased survival to discharge (odds ratio, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.61-14.19), which was confirmed by inverse probability weighting (adjusted odds ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.90-7.32).

conclusionsREBOA for t-OHCA was associated with higher survival to discharge. These results should be validated by further research.

Indexed as

aortic occlusionballoon occlusioncardiac arrestmortalityOHCAREBOAresuscitative thoracotomytraumatic cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID33000081
PMCPMC7493555
OpenAlexW3040560710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.