Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000073›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020

Racial and sex disparities in HIV screening outcomes within emergency departments of Harris County, Texas.

Mandy J Hill, Marylou Cardenas-Turanzas, Samuel Prater, Jeffrey W Campbell, Marlene McNeese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Utilizing emergency departments for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mandy J HillDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Population Health McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) Houston Texas.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-358X
Marylou Cardenas-TuranzasDepartment of Emergency Medicine School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) Houston Texas.
Samuel PraterDepartment of Emergency Medicine McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) Houston Texas.
Jeffrey W CampbellAIDS Foundation Houston Houston Texas.
Marlene McNeeseHouston Health Department Division of Disease Prevention and Control Houston Texas.

Funding

EXPANDED and INTERGRATED HIV TESTING for POPULATIONS DISPROPORTIONTELY AFFECTED U62PS000775 · PS · HOUSTON DEPARTMENT/HEALTH/HUMAN SRVS · PI MCNEESE, MARLENE · 2007 to 2009
$3.2M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS U62 PS000775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe emergency department provides opportunities for identifying undiagnosed HIV cases. We sought to describe the racial and sex epidemiology of HIV through ED screening in Harris County, Texas, one of the most diverse and populous metropolitan cities in the Southern United States.

methodsWe used a descriptive secondary analysis of a universal HIV screening program (2010-2017) to quantify demographic differences in HIV incidence. We applied a validated codebook to a dataset by the local health department containing 894,387 records of ED visits with 62 variables to assess race/ethnicity and sex differences.

resultsOf 885,199 (98.9%) patients screened for HIV during an ED visit, 1795 tested positive (incidence rate = 0.2%). Of those tested for HIV, most were White (66.3%), followed by racial minorities (African Americans (29.9%), Asians (3.6%), and American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islanders (natives) (0.1%). Half of those tested were Hispanic. Conversely, of patients testing positive (n = 1782, 99.3% of positive cases), most were African American (52.6%) followed by Whites (46.6%), Asians (0.7%), and natives (0.1%). Less than half (35.5%) of positives were Hispanic. A racial disparity in HIV incidence was discovered among African American females. This group represented 16.8% of the tested population; yet accounted for 65.8% of females who tested positive for HIV and 20.3% of all HIV-positive test results.

conclusionDescriptive findings of the racial and sex epidemiology of HIV revealed that African American females had the largest disparity between the population tested and those who tested positive for HIV.

Indexed as

African Americansdisparitiesemergency departmentHIVHIV screeningracesex

Identifiers

PMID33000073
PMCPMC7493530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.