Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000067›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020

Clinical characteristics and course of out-of-hospital shock in a national emergency medical services cohort.

Timothy P George, Hei Kit Chan, Remle P Crowe, Jeffrey L Jarvis, Jan O Jansen, Ryan M Huebinger, Henry E Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy P GeorgeMcGovern Medical School University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
Hei Kit ChanDepartment of Biostatistics School of Public Health The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
Remle P CroweESO Inc. Austin Texas USA.
Jeffrey L JarvisWilliamson County Emergency Medical Services Georgetown Texas USA.
Jan O JansenCenter for Injury Science University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.
Ryan M HuebingerDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.
Henry E WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4738-0093
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USEsgee Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USWilliamson College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShock from medical and traumatic conditions can result in organ injury and death. Limited data describe out-of-hospital treatment of shock. We sought to characterize adult out-of-hospital shock care in a national emergency medical services (EMS) cohort.

methodsThis cross-sectional study used 2018 data from ESO, Inc. (Austin, TX), a national EMS electronic health record system, containing data from 1289 EMS agencies in the United States. We included adult (age ≥18 years) non-cardiac arrest patients with shock, defined as initial systolic blood pressure ≤80 mm Hg. We compared patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and response (defined as systolic blood pressure increase) between medical and traumatic shock patients, looking at systolic blood pressure trends over the first 90 minutes of care.

resultsAmong 6,156,895 adult 911 responses, shock was present in 62,867 (1.02%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01%-1.03%); 54,239 (86.3%) medical and 5978 (9.5%) traumatic, and 2650 unknown. Medical was more common than traumatic shock in women and older patients. The most common injuries associated with traumatic shock were falls (37.6%) and motor vehicle crashes (18.7%). Mean initial and final medical systolic blood pressure were 71 ± 10 mm Hg and 99 ± 24 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure increased in 88.8% and decreased or did not change in 11.0%. Mean initial and final trauma systolic blood pressure were 71 ± 13 mm Hg and 105 ± 28 mm Hg; systolic blood pressure increased in 90.4% and decreased/did not change in 9.6%. On fractional polynomial modeling, systolic blood pressure changes were greater and faster for trauma than medical shock.

conclusionsIn this national series, 1 of every 100 EMS encounters involved shock. These findings highlight the current course and care of shock in the out-of-hospital setting.

Indexed as

emergency medical serviceshypotensionparamedicsresuscitationsepsisshocktrauma

Identifiers

PMID33000067
PMCPMC7493535
OpenAlexW3027801170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.