Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33000040›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020

Impact of bed angle and height on intubation success during simulated endotracheal intubation in the ramped position.

Dhimitri A Nikolla, Ryann R Beaumont, Jessica L Lerman, Joseph S Datsko, Jestin N Carlson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dhimitri A NikollaDepartment of Emergency Medicine Allegheny Health Network-Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3268-3443
Ryann R BeaumontDepartment of Emergency Medicine Allegheny Health Network-Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie Pennsylvania.
Jessica L LermanDepartment of Emergency Medicine Allegheny Health Network-Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie Pennsylvania.
Joseph S DatskoDepartment of Emergency Medicine Allegheny Health Network-Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie Pennsylvania.
Jestin N CarlsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine Allegheny Health Network-Saint Vincent Hospital, Erie Pennsylvania.
Allegheny Health Network · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe ramped position is often used during endotracheal intubation to improve oxygenation, improve laryngeal views, and reduce airway complications. We sought to compare the impact of ramp angle and bed height on intubation outcomes during simulated endotracheal intubation.

methodsWe enrolled emergency medicine residents and fourth-year medical students to perform simulated direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in random order with the mannequin in the following combinations of ramp angles and bed heights; ramp angles of 25° and 45° at bed heights including knee, mid-thigh, umbilicus, xiphoid, and nipple/intermammary fold. Our primary outcome was the reported percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score. Secondary outcomes included number of laryngoscopy attempts and intubation time.

resultsWe enrolled 25 participants. There was no difference in reported POGO scores at 25° between bed heights, but at 45°, the umbilicus bed height had an improved reported POGO score (20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-33,

conclusionThe umbilicus bed height resulted in the highest reported POGO at 45°. Nipple/inframammary fold height resulted in worse intubating conditions.

Indexed as

airway managementhypoxiaintratrachealintubationlaryngoscopypositionrespiratory insufficiencysimulation

Identifiers

PMID33000040
PMCPMC7493484
OpenAlexW3011162640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.