ReviewCurrent developments in nutrition2020
Our Current Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A-Now 20 Years Old.
Review in Current developments in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Vitamin A Concentration in Human Milk: A Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Pediatric Pneumococcus and Hepatitis A Vaccinations With or Without a High-Dose Oral Vitamin A Supplement.Biomolecules · 2025Trial
- Review
- ALDH1A1 in breast cancer: A prospective target to overcome therapy resistance (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- The immunomodulatory role of all-trans retinoic acid in tumor microenvironment.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023Review
- Retinoid metabolism: new insights.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2022Review
- Dietary vitamin A intakes of chinese children with adequate liver stores as assessed by the retinol isotope dilution technique.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- The Biological Role of Vitamins in Athletes' Muscle, Heart and Microbiota.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Synthetic Retinoids Beyond Cancer Therapy.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2022Review
- Vitamin A, systemic T-cells, and the eye: Focus on degenerative retinal disease.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Biological evidence to define a vitamin A deficiency cutoff using total liver vitamin A reserves.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021Review
- COVID-19: Is there a role for immunonutrition in obese patient?Journal of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Prediction of Vitamin A Stores in Young Children Provides Insights into the Adequacy of Current Dietary Reference Intakes.Current developments in nutrition · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The DRI values for vitamin A were last reviewed and defined in 2001. At the time, there was very sparse data that could be used to set the DRI values for pregnancy, lactation, and infancy. In the subsequent 20 y since the last formal review, a number of findings relevant to the adequacy indicator of visual dark adaptation in pregnancy, the usual vitamin A content of breast milk across lactation stages, and vitamin A metabolism in women and children have been published. Furthermore, identification of genetic variables affecting the bioconversion of provitamin A carotenoids to vitamin A have provided an improved explanation for interindividual variability in responses to provitamin A carotenoids. The purpose of this collection of articles, introduced herein, is to review and apply recent findings about vitamin A status, address current gaps in knowledge, and suggest avenues for future research needed to refine the DRI values for pregnancy, lactation, and early life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.