Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32999916›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020

Remote cognitive and behavioral assessment: Report of the Alzheimer Society of Canada Task Force on dementia care best practices for COVID-19.

Maiya R Geddes, Megan E O'Connell, John D Fisk, Serge Gauthier, Richard Camicioli, Zahinoor Ismail, Alzheimer Society of Canada Task Force on Dementia Care Best Practices for COVID‐19

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. User Experience of a (Semi-) Automated Cognitive Phone-Based Assessment Within a Memory Clinic Population.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maiya R GeddesDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery Montreal Neurological Institute McGill University Montreal Canada.
Megan E O'ConnellDepartment of Psychology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Canada.
John D FiskDepartment of Psychiatry Dalhousie University Halifax Canada.
Serge GauthierMcGill Center for Studies in Aging McGill University Verdun Canada.
Richard CamicioliNeuroscience and Mental Health Institute and Department of Medicine Division of Neurology University of Alberta Edmonton Canada.
Zahinoor IsmailDepartments of Psychiatry, Clinical Neurosciences, and Community Health Sciences Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.
Alzheimer Society of Canada Task Force on Dementia Care Best Practices for COVID‐19

Funding

Core B - Pilot StudiesP30AG048785 · NIA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LACHMAN, MARGIE E · 2014 to 2023
$4.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG048785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the urgent need for remote neurobehavioral assessment of individuals with cognitive impairment, guidance is lacking. Our goal is to provide a multi-dimensional framework for remotely assessing cognitive, functional, behavioral, and physical aspects of people with cognitive impairment, along with ethical and technical considerations.

methodsLiterature review on remote cognitive assessment and multidisciplinary expert opinion from behavioral neurologists, neuropsychiatrists, neuropsychologists, and geriatricians was integrated under the auspices of the Alzheimer Society of Canada Task Force on Dementia Care Best Practices for COVID-19. Telephone and video approaches to assessments were considered.

resultsRemote assessment is shown to be acceptable to patients and caregivers. Informed consent, informant history, and attention to privacy and autonomy are paramount. A range of screening and domain-specific instruments are available for telephone or video assessment of cognition, function, and behavior. Some neuropsychological tests administered by videoconferencing show good agreement with in-person assessment but still lack validation and norms. Aspects of the remote dementia-focused neurological examination can be performed reliably. DISCUSSION: Despite challenges, current literature and practice support implementation of telemedicine assessments for patients with cognitive impairment. Convergence of data across the clinical interview, reliable and brief remote cognitive tests, and remote neurological exam increase confidence in clinical interpretation and diagnosis.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseassessmentcognitive impairmentdementiatelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32999916
PMCPMC7507991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.