Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32999902›Full record

ArticleGE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology2020

Predictive Factors and Clinical Impact of Deep Remission in Celiac Disease.

Marta Silva, Armando Peixoto, Ana Luísa Santos, Pedro Costa-Moreira, Joel Ferreira da Silva, Emanuel Dias, Guilherme Macedo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Can the Mucosa Heal Histologically in Celiac Disease? What are the Indicators of Remission in Celiac Patients?The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mucosal Healing in Celiac Disease: A Necessary or Unrealistic Goal?GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta SilvaPorto Medical School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Armando PeixotoPorto Medical School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ana Luísa SantosPorto Medical School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Pedro Costa-MoreiraPorto Medical School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Joel Ferreira da SilvaPorto Medical School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Emanuel DiasPorto Medical School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Guilherme MacedoPorto Medical School, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe ultimate indicator of adherence to a gluten-free diet is the demonstration of mucosal healing. However, the need for histological reassessment is subject to controversy among "experts". The aim of this study was to evaluate celiac patients who underwent histological reevaluation after starting a gluten-free diet in order to identify those with histological remission and associated factors.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients who agreed to a histological reassessment after apparent clinical and serological remission and reported at least 12 months of diet adherence. In all cases, informed consent was signed for upper endoscopy.

resultsA total of 69 patients were included. In 67.9% of cases, the diagnosis was made in the context of "classic" symptomatology, 17% had "nonclassical" presentation, and 15.1% were in latent phase. 69.2% of the diagnoses were initially suspected by serology. Endoscopically, 11.8% of the patients did not present suggestive features macroscopically, and a histological grade of Marsh IIIa-c was observed in 75.5% of all cases. The histological findings were normalized in 37.7%, which was associated with the presence of lower Marsh score values at diagnosis (

conclusionEven under a gluten-free diet, celiac histology normalization is difficult to obtain and appears to be independent of most clinical and serological findings at diagnosis. Patients with less severe histological levels at diagnosis reach remission more easily, but only represent the -minority of the population.

Indexed as

Celiac diseaseDeep remissionEndoscopic reassessmentGluten-free diet

Identifiers

PMID32999902
PMCPMC7506239
OpenAlexW2954565093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.