Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32999827›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2020

Machine Learning-Assisted Evaluation of Circulating DNA Quantitative Analysis for Cancer Screening.

Rita Tanos, Guillaume Tosato, Amaelle Otandault, Zahra Al Amir Dache, Laurence Pique Lasorsa, Geoffroy Tousch, Safia El Messaoudi, Romain Meddeb, Mona Diab Assaf, Marc Ychou and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Computational healthcare: Present and future perspectives (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Rita TanosIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Guillaume TosatoIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Amaelle OtandaultIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Zahra Al Amir DacheIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Laurence Pique LasorsaIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Geoffroy TouschIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Safia El MessaoudiIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Romain MeddebIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Mona Diab AssafFaculty of Science II Department of Biochemistry Lebanese University Fanar Beirut 2611 Lebanon.
Marc YchouIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Stanislas Du ManoirIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Denis PezetCHU Clermont-Fd Clermont-Ferrand 63100 France.
Johan GagnièreCHU Clermont-Fd Clermont-Ferrand 63100 France.
Pierre-Emmanuel ColomboInstitut régional du Cancer de Montpellier Montpellier F-34298 France.
William JacotInstitut régional du Cancer de Montpellier Montpellier F-34298 France.
Eric AssénatCHU Saint-Eloi Montpellier F-34090 France.
Marie DupuyCHU Lapeyronnie Montpellier F-34090 France.
Antoine AdenisIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Thibault MazardIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Caroline MolleviIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
José María SayaguésCentro de Investigación del Cáncer Cytometry General Service and Department of Medicine University of Salamanca Salamanca 37007 Spain.
Jacques ColingeIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.
Alain R ThierryIRCM Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U1194 Montpellier F-34090 France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4632-5404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the utility of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cancer screening and early detection have recently been investigated by testing genetic and epigenetic alterations, here, an original approach by examining cfDNA quantitative and structural features is developed. First, the potential of cfDNA quantitative and structural parameters is independently demonstrated in cell culture, murine, and human plasma models. Subsequently, these variables are evaluated in a large retrospective cohort of 289 healthy individuals and 983 patients with various cancer types; after age resampling, this evaluation is done independently and the variables are combined using a machine learning approach. Implementation of a decision tree prediction model for the detection and classification of healthy and cancer patients shows unprecedented performance for 0, I, and II colorectal cancer stages (specificity, 0.89 and sensitivity, 0.72). Consequently, the methodological proof of concept of using both quantitative and structural biomarkers, and classification with a machine learning method are highlighted, as an efficient strategy for cancer screening. It is foreseen that the classification rate may even be improved by the addition of such biomarkers to fragmentomics, methylation, or the detection of genetic alterations. The optimization of such a multianalyte strategy with this machine learning method is therefore warranted.

Indexed as

cancercirculating DNAearly diagnosismachine learningscreening

Identifiers

PMID32999827
PMCPMC7509651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.