Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32999792›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Who Watches the "Watchman" and How Often?

Kyaw M Hlaing, Thein T Aung, Kevin Kravitz, Kamran Riaz

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyaw M HlaingInternal Medicine, LewisGale Medical Center, Salem, USA.
Thein T AungCardiology, Miami Valley Hospital, Wright State University, Dayton, USA.
Kevin KravitzCardiology, Miami Valley Hospital, Wright State University, Dayton, USA.
Kamran RiazCardiology, Miami Valley Hospital, Wright State University, Dayton, USA.
Lewis Gale Medical Center · USWright State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that is encountered during the hospitalization. Sometimes, many patients cannot be anticoagulated to prevent AF-related cardiovascular accidents because of the risk of bleeding. In these cases, we recommend putting left atrial appendage (LAA) to prevent thrombus formation in the left atrium due to AF. There is no clear time frame of how long we need to follow up with echocardiogram to monitor device-related blood clot formation and continue anticoagulation therapy if there is recurrent thrombus formation after LAA placement. We would like to present a case with AF in which the patient had epistaxis, which required to hold anticoagulation and arterial embolization. The patient agreed to the placement of the Watchman device and subsequently it was complicated by device-related thrombosis (DRT). The patient required prolonged anticoagulation treatment and follow-up echocardiogram to prevent DRT in the future.

Indexed as

anticoagulationleft atrial appendage occluderecurrent thrombosiswatchman device

Identifiers

PMID32999792
PMCPMC7522047
OpenAlexW3082584799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.