Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32999702›Full record

ArticleJournal of advances in modeling earth systems2020

An Efficient Ice Sheet/Earth System Model Spin-up Procedure for CESM2-CISM2: Description, Evaluation, and Broader Applicability.

Marcus Lofverstrom, Jeremy G Fyke, Katherine Thayer-Calder, Laura Muntjewerf, Miren Vizcaino, William J Sacks, William H Lipscomb, Bette L Otto-Bliesner, Sarah L Bradley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcus LofverstromDepartment of Geosciences University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8016-865X
Jeremy G FykeAssociated Engineering Group Ltd. Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-3019
Katherine Thayer-CalderClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1501-8444
Laura MuntjewerfDepartment of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Delft University of Technology Delft Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1969-5899
Miren VizcainoDepartment of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Delft University of Technology Delft Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-7104
William J SacksClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2902-5263
William H LipscombClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-3730
Bette L Otto-BliesnerClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1911-1598
Sarah L BradleyDepartment of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Delft University of Technology Delft Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3740-5696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinning up a highly complex, coupled Earth system model (ESM) is a time consuming and computationally demanding exercise. For models with interactive ice sheet components, this becomes a major challenge, as ice sheets are sensitive to bidirectional feedback processes and equilibrate over glacial timescales of up to many millennia. This work describes and demonstrates a computationally tractable, iterative procedure for spinning up a contemporary, highly complex ESM that includes an interactive ice sheet component. The procedure alternates between a computationally expensive coupled configuration and a computationally cheaper configuration where the atmospheric component is replaced by a data model. By periodically regenerating atmospheric forcing consistent with the coupled system, the data atmosphere remains adequately constrained to ensure that the broader model state evolves realistically. The applicability of the method is demonstrated by spinning up the preindustrial climate in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2), coupled to the Community Ice Sheet Model Version 2 (CISM2) over Greenland. The equilibrium climate state is similar to the control climate from a coupled simulation with a prescribed Greenland ice sheet, indicating that the iterative procedure is consistent with a traditional spin-up approach without interactive ice sheets. These results suggest that the iterative method presented here provides a faster and computationally cheaper method for spinning up a highly complex ESM, with or without interactive ice sheet components. The method described here has been used to develop the climate/ice sheet initial conditions for transient, ice sheet-enabled simulations with CESM2-CISM2 in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6).

Indexed as

Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2)Coupled ice‐sheet/Earth system modelingInteractive ice sheetsSpin‐up simulation

Identifiers

PMID32999702
PMCPMC7507768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.