Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32999674›Full record

ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology

A Human Amniotic Membrane Plug to Treat Persistent Macular Hole.

Luca Ventre, Paola Marolo, Michele Reibaldi

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biological ultrathin amniotic membrane flap to close refractory macular holes associated with high myopia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luca VentreEye Clinic Section, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paola MaroloEye Clinic Section, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Michele ReibaldiEye Clinic Section, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human amniotic membrane (hAM) has lately demonstrated interesting potential in its retinal applications. Nowadays, the treatment of persistent macular holes is still a challenge. In this paper, we present a case of a hAM plug used to treat a persistent macular hole, with the purpose of highlighting the critical issues of this new surgical procedure. We performed a 23-G pars plana vitrectomy and inserted a hAM plug (diameter of 1.5 mm) under the neuroretinal margins of the hole (diameter of 657 μm). A complete ophthalmic examination with the assessment of best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR units, ETDRS letter score) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans were collected at 1, 4, 6, and 10 weeks after surgery. Visual acuity changed from logMAR 1.0 (1) preoperatively to logMAR 1.0 (2), 1.0 (4), 0.9 (9), and 0.9 (10) at 1, 4, 6, and 10 weeks of follow-up, respectively. The 1 week postoperative OCT did not show neuroretinal adhesion over the plug, but the following visits showed reattachment of the margins with partial neuroretinal ingrowth. These findings suggest that the correct adaptation of the size of the hAM plug to the macular hole is essential to allow the anatomical closure of the hole and potential functional results.

Indexed as

Human amniotic membraneMacular holeVitreoretinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID32999674
PMCPMC7506270
OpenAlexW3047935858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.