ReviewJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2020
Use of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: Indications and outcomes.
Review in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cumulative revision rates in total hip arthroplasty depending on acetabular cup fixation: an analysis from the German arthroplasty registry.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Indication-Based Reconstruction Strategies in a Retrospective Observational Cohort of Patients with Paprosky Type IIC Acetabular Defects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- [Why does a total hip replacement dislocate? : Diagnosis and management].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Dual Mobility Acetabular Cup Utilization in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Mitigating Instability Risks.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Dual-mobility implants in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Review
- Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of risk factors and preventive options.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Review
- Dual-Mobility Acetabular Components in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Do Not Increase the Risk of Complication Compared to Conventional Articulations: A Matched Cohort Comparative Analysis.Arthroplasty today · 2024Article
- Central Fracture-Dislocation of the Hip with Ipsilateral Femoral Neck Fracture in an Elderly Patient with Parkinsonism Managed with Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
- Instantaneous Generation of Subject-Specific Finite Element Models of the Hip Capsule.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Dual Mobility Cups as the Routine Choice in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Instability after total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a problematic complication and remains one of the leading causes of revision surgery in the early post-operative period. Dual mobility (DM) implants decrease dislocation risk after THA but they come with their own set of complications. Selective use of DM implants for THA in high risk groups can confer the advantages of this construct while mitigating the risks. In this paper, we review the current literature to examine the evidence for or against use of DM implants in various clinical scenarios and provide an algorithm for when to consider using DM design construct in THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.