ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2021
Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted Biopsy and Extended Transperineal Systematic Biopsy for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: the SMART Trial
Prospective Randomized Controlled Study: Free-Hand Transperineal vs. Transrectal Systematic and Image Fusion Targeted Biopsies Under Local Anesthesia Comparing Rate of Significant Cancer Detection and Complication Rates
3D-Ultrasound-Guided Transperineal Microwave Needle Ablation for Men With Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia using a novel needle guide system with angle-adjustment feature.The Canadian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Transperineal prostate biopsy with freehand technique under local anaesthetic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.BJUI compass · 2025Review
- Meta Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Prostate Biopsy: A Comparison Between Transperineal and Transrectal Approach.Urology research & practice · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial prophylaxis: To do or not to do? This is the question.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2024Article
- Updated prevalence of latent prostate cancer in Chinese population and comparison of biopsy results: An autopsy-based study.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Article
- Role of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.European urology open science · 2022Review
- The role of music in outpatient prostate biopsy: A comprehensive literature review.Turkish journal of urology · 2022Article
- Oral antibiotics perturbation on gut microbiota after prostate biopsy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
- The Role of Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Under Local Anesthesia Without Antibiotics in Outpatient Settings.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the feasibility of a freehand transperineal (TP) systematic prostate biopsy protocol under local anaesthesia (LA) and the value of different sectors in diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa).
methodsA total of 611 consecutive freehand TP biopsies under LA in 2 hospitals were prospectively evaluated. Cancer detection rate in each of the four different sectors (anterior, mid, posterior, basal) was recorded to evaluate the value of each sector. Procedure tolerability was assessed by pain score and complications were documented.
resultsSystematic biopsies were performed in 556 out of 611 men with a median of 20 (IQR 12-24) biopsy cores taken. The median PSA was 9.9 (Inter-quartile range[IQR] 6.4-16.2) ng/mL, and 89.0% were first biopsies. All PCa and ISUP grade group (GG) ≥ 2 PCa (HGPCa) were diagnosed in 41.4% (230/556) and 28.2% (157/556) biopsies respectively. 77.0% HGPCa was diagnosed in ≥2 sectors. Single-sector HGPCa was predominantly found in anterior or posterior sector. Omitting base sector would have missed 1.5% (1/65) HGPCa out of the 219 cases with ≥24-core biopsies performed. Further omission of mid sector would have missed 3.1% (2/65) HGPCa and 7.4% (7/94) ISUP GG1 PCa (in which 3/7 involved 2 sectors). LA TP biopsy was well tolerated and the mean pain scores of the different steps of the procedure were between 1.9-3.1 (out of 10). Post-biopsy fever occurred in 0.3% of patients (2/611) and no sepsis was reported. The risk of urinary retention in men with ≥20 cores in ≥60 ml prostate was 7.8% (14/179), compared with 1.7% (7/423) in other groups (p < 0.001).
conclusionsTP sectoral prostate biopsy under LA was well tolerated with minimal sepsis risk. Basal sector biopsies had minimal additional value to HGPCa detection and its omission can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.