ReviewBMJ global health2020
Understanding and comparing HIV-related law and policy environments: cross-national data and accountability for the global AIDS response.
Review in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- An analysis of national guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan African countries: gaps and opportunities.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Article
- Characterizing tuberculosis diagnosis and the associations with economic instability and employment discrimination among women living with HIV across 11 countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a cross-sectional study.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Global Legal Environment for LGBTQ+ Sexuality and Public Health.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2025Article
- Using country-level variables to discover country clusters beyond traditional health policy and performance metrics: An unsupervised machine learning approach for HIV healthcare delivery and financing.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Recent South African court rulings on failing to disclose HIV status to sexual partners.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024Article
- Laws for health and care worker protection and rights: A study of 182 countries.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Article
- HIV policy legacies, pandemic preparedness and policy effort to address COVID-19.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Stigmatizing Policies Interact with Mental Health and Sexual Behaviours to Structurally Induce HIV Diagnoses Among European Men Who Have Sex with Men.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Highlighting the need for investment and innovation in ART retention interventions.The Lancet. Global health · 2022Article
- Ways of HIV transmission in China: The effect of age, period, and cohort.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Law, criminalisation and HIV in the world: have countries that criminalise achieved more or less successful pandemic response?BMJ global health · 2021Review
- Global Policy Surveillance: Creating and Using Comparative National Data on Health Law and Policy.American journal of public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Law and policy differences help explain why, as HIV-related science has advanced swiftly, some countries have realised remarkable progress on AIDS while others see expanding epidemics. We describe the structure and findings of a new dataset and research platform, the HIV Policy Lab, which fills an important knowledge gap by measuring the HIV-related policy environment across 33 indicators and 194 countries over time, with online access and visualisation. Cross-national indicators can be critical tools in international governance-building social power to monitor state behaviour with the potential to change policy and improve domestic accountability. This new and evolving effort collects data about policy through review of legal documents, official government reports and systematic review of secondary sources. Alignment between national policy environments and global norms is demonstrated through comparison with international public health guidance and agreements. We demonstrate substantial variation in the content of law and policies between countries, regions and policy areas. Given progress in basic and implementation science, it would be tempting to believe most countries have adopted policies aligned with global norms, with a few outliers. Data show this is not the case. Globally, alignment is higher on clinical and treatment policies than on prevention, testing and structural policies. Policy-makers, researchers, civil society, finance agencies and others can use these data to better understand the policy environment within and across countries and support reform. Longitudinal analysis enables evaluation of the impact of laws and policies on HIV outcomes and research about the political drivers of policy choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.