Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32998727›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2020

Missed opportunities to prevent cardiovascular disease in women with prior preeclampsia.

Alina Brener, Irene Lewnard, Jennifer Mackinnon, Cresta Jones, Nicole Lohr, Sreenivas Konda, Jennifer McIntosh, Jacquelyn Kulinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pregnancy complications and later life women's health.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alina BrenerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Irene LewnardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lowell General Hospital, Lowell, MA, USA.
Jennifer MackinnonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Cresta JonesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicole LohrDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Sreenivas KondaDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jennifer McIntoshDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jacquelyn KulinskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. jakulinski@mcw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-7197
Medical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USLowell General Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women in every major developed country and in most emerging nations. Complications of pregnancy, including preeclampsia, indicate a subsequent increase in cardiovascular risk. There may be a primary care provider knowledge gap regarding preeclampsia as a risk factor for CVD. The objective of our study is to determine how often internists at an academic institution inquire about a history of preeclampsia, as compared to a history of smoking, hypertension and diabetes, when assessing CVD risk factors at well-woman visits. Additional aims were (1) to educate internal medicine primary care providers on the significance of preeclampsia as a risk factor for CVD disease and (2) to assess the impact of education interventions on obstetric history documentation and screening for CVD in women with prior preeclampsia.

methodsA retrospective chart review was performed to identify women ages 18-48 with at least one prior obstetric delivery. We evaluated the frequency of documentation of preeclampsia compared to traditional risk factors for CVD (smoking, diabetes, and chronic hypertension) by reviewing the well-woman visit notes, past medical history, obstetric history, and the problem list in the electronic medical record. For intervention, educational teaching sessions (presentation with Q&A session) and education slide presentations were given to internal medicine physicians at clinic sites. Changes in documentation were evaluated post-intervention.

resultsWhen assessment of relevant pregnancy history was obtained, 23.6% of women were asked about a history preeclampsia while 98.9% were asked about diabetes or smoking and 100% were asked about chronic hypertension (p < 0.001). Education interventions did not significantly change rates of screening documentation (p = 0.36).

conclusionOur study adds to the growing body of literature that women with a history of preeclampsia might not be identified as having increased CVD risk in the outpatient primary care setting. Novel educational programming may be required to increase provider documentation of preeclampsia history in screening.

Indexed as

Medical History TakingAdolescentAdultCardiovascular DiseasesClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHypertensionInternal MedicineMiddle AgedObstetricsPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularCardiovascular diseaseHypertensive disease of pregnancyPreeclampsiaPrimary prevention

Identifiers

PMID32998727
PMCPMC7528479
OpenAlexW3091632319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.