Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32998692›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Robust edge-based biomarker discovery improves prediction of breast cancer metastasis.

Nahim Adnan, Chengwei Lei, Jianhua Ruan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nahim AdnanDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, 78249, TX, USA.
Chengwei LeiDepartment of Computer & Electrical Engineering/Computer Science, California State University, Bakersfield, 9001 Stockdale Highway, Bakersfield, 93311, CA, USA.
Jianhua RuanDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, 78249, TX, USA. jianhua.ruan@utsa.edu.
The University of Texas at San Antonio · USCalifornia State University, Bakersfield · US

Funding

Systems Analysis of Epigenomic Architecture in Cancer ProgressionU54CA217297 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI HUANG, TIM H.-M. · 2017 to 2021
$9.3M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe abundance of molecular profiling of breast cancer tissues entailed active research on molecular marker-based early diagnosis of metastasis. Recently there is a surging interest in combining gene expression with gene networks such as protein-protein interaction (PPI) network, gene co-expression (CE) network and pathway information to identify robust and accurate biomarkers for metastasis prediction, reflecting the common belief that cancer is a systems biology disease. However, controversy exists in the literature regarding whether network markers are indeed better features than genes alone for predicting as well as understanding metastasis. We believe much of the existing results may have been biased by the overly complicated prediction algorithms, unfair evaluation, and lack of rigorous statistics. In this study, we propose a simple approach to use network edges as features, based on two types of networks respectively, and compared their prediction power using three classification algorithms and rigorous statistical procedure on one of the largest datasets available. To detect biomarkers that are significant for the prediction and to compare the robustness of different feature types, we propose an unbiased and novel procedure to measure feature importance that eliminates the potential bias from factors such as different sample size, number of features, as well as class distribution.

resultsExperimental results reveal that edge-based feature types consistently outperformed gene-based feature type in random forest and logistic regression models under all performance evaluation metrics, while the prediction accuracy of edge-based support vector machine (SVM) model was poorer, due to the larger number of edge features compared to gene features and the lack of feature selection in SVM model. Experimental results also show that edge features are much more robust than gene features and the top biomarkers from edge feature types are statistically more significantly enriched in the biological processes that are well known to be related to breast cancer metastasis.

conclusionsOverall, this study validates the utility of edge features as biomarkers but also highlights the importance of carefully designed experimental procedures in order to achieve statistically reliable comparison results.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLogistic ModelsNeoplasm MetastasisProtein Interaction MapsROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorBiomarker discoveryBreast cancer metastasisBreast cancer predictionComparative analysisGene expressionNetwork-based classification

Identifiers

PMID32998692
PMCPMC7526355
OpenAlexW3089646899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.