Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32998409›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Electrochemical Immuno- and Aptamer-Based Assays for Bacteria: Pros and Cons over Traditional Detection Schemes.

Rimsha Binte Jamal, Stepan Shipovskov, Elena E Ferapontova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phage Therapy forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biosensors-Recent Advances and Future Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rimsha Binte JamalInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University Gustav Wieds Vej 14, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Stepan ShipovskovInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University Gustav Wieds Vej 14, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Elena E FerapontovaInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University Gustav Wieds Vej 14, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1177-3204

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 813439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiological safety of the human environment and health needs advanced monitoring tools both for the specific detection of bacteria in complex biological matrices, often in the presence of excessive amounts of other bacterial species, and for bacteria quantification at a single cell level. Here, we discuss the existing electrochemical approaches for bacterial analysis that are based on the biospecific recognition of whole bacterial cells. Perspectives of such assays applications as emergency-use biosensors for quick analysis of trace levels of bacteria by minimally trained personnel are argued.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideBacteriaBiosensing TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesHumansAptamers, Nucleotidebacteriaelectrochemical aptamer-based assayselectrochemical ELISAelectrochemical immunoassayselectrochemistry

Identifiers

PMID32998409
PMCPMC7582323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.