Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32998350›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Teaching Research Ethics to Pharmacists: The Practice of Participatory Learning.

Miku Ogura, Rieko Takehira, Etsuko Arita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miku OguraDepartment of Medical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Education Research Center, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-4646
Rieko TakehiraDepartment of Medical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Education Research Center, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4319-1041
Etsuko AritaDepartment of Medical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Education Research Center, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo 108-8641, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0993-8233

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP17K08463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research history of community pharmacists in Japan is short, and ethical responses may not be mature. Therefore, the Japan Pharmaceutical Association and universities are working on research ethics education to help pharmacists make appropriate ethical responses. In this study, we evaluated whether an educational program using participatory learning was effective in research ethics education for pharmacists. Regarding the educational effects of our workshop, the score for motivation to learn about research ethics was high, and that for judgment and applied skills related to research ethics was low. Overall, participants' assessment of the program contents was extremely favorable, indicating their satisfaction. Participatory learning was widely accepted and suggested to be effective in improving learning motivation. Additionally, to be able to apply the knowledge of research ethics to own research, it was considered necessary to continue learning through participatory learning. This will help pharmacists gain judgment and applied skills related to research ethics.

Indexed as

clinical researchethical educationpharmacy educationworkshop

Identifiers

PMID32998350
PMCPMC7712191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.