Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32998329›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Deep Learning in Gait Parameter Prediction for OA and TKA Patients Wearing IMU Sensors.

Mohsen Sharifi Renani, Casey A Myers, Rohola Zandie, Mohammad H Mahoor, Bradley S Davidson, Chadd W Clary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Advances in deep learning multimodal fusion for early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohsen Sharifi RenaniCenter for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
Casey A MyersCenter for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
Rohola ZandieCenter for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
Mohammad H MahoorCenter for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
Bradley S DavidsonCenter for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.
Chadd W ClaryCenter for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA.

Funding

Knoebel Institute for Healthy Aging NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative assessments of patient movement quality in osteoarthritis (OA), specifically spatiotemporal gait parameters (STGPs), can provide in-depth insight into gait patterns, activity types, and changes in mobility after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A study was conducted to benchmark the ability of multiple deep neural network (DNN) architectures to predict 12 STGPs from inertial measurement unit (IMU) data and to identify an optimal sensor combination, which has yet to be studied for OA and TKA subjects. DNNs were trained using movement data from 29 subjects, walking at slow, normal, and fast paces and evaluated with cross-fold validation over the subjects. Optimal sensor locations were determined by comparing prediction accuracy with 15 IMU configurations (pelvis, thigh, shank, and feet). Percent error across the 12 STGPs ranged from 2.1% (stride time) to 73.7% (toe-out angle) and overall was more accurate in temporal parameters than spatial parameters. The most and least accurate sensor combinations were feet-thighs and singular pelvis, respectively. DNNs showed promising results in predicting STGPs for OA and TKA subjects based on signals from IMU sensors and overcomes the dependency on sensor locations that can hinder the design of patient monitoring systems for clinical application.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDeep LearningGaitOsteoarthritisHumansWalkingconvolutional neural networkdeep learninggait analysistotal knee arthroplastywearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID32998329
PMCPMC7582246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.