Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32998211›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Ultimate Full Contact: Fight Outcome Characterization Concerning Their Methods, Occurrence Times and Technical-Tactical Developments.

Fernando C Loio Pinto, Henrique Neiva, Célia Nunes, Mário C Marques, António C Sousa, Daniel A Marinho, Luís Branquinho, Ricardo Ferraz

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fernando C Loio PintoDepartment of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.
Henrique NeivaDepartment of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-312X
Célia NunesDepartment of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0167-4851
Mário C MarquesDepartment of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.
António C SousaDepartment of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.
Daniel A MarinhoDepartment of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.
Luís BranquinhoDepartment of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.
Ricardo FerrazDepartment of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7530-512X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fight analysis produces relevant technical-tactical information. However, this knowledge is limited in hybrid full-contact combat sports. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize the results of the fights' outcomes through the winners at the World Ultimate Full Contact (WUFC) Championships between 2008 and 2017. Methods: 170 combats between senior male fighters (master class) from 38 countries were observed; all fight outcome methods, their occurrence times, inherent skills and their development forms were analyzed through frequencies, percentages, crosstabs and chi-square test, considering a Fisher's exact value of

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceMartial ArtsCompetitive BehaviorCraniocerebral TraumaHumansMaleTime and Motion Studiesattack combinationscombat sportscounter-attackknockoutKOsingle attackskillsstand-up and ground fightingstylessubmissiontechnical

Identifiers

PMID32998211
PMCPMC7579074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.