Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32998176›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2021

Effect of different glucogenic to lipogenic nutrient ratios on rumen fermentation and bacterial community in vitro.

D Hua, Y Zhao, X Nan, F Xue, Y Wang, L Jiang, B Xiong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of Phlorotannins fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Glucogenic and lipogenic diets affectFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

D HuaState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6427-1406
Y ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
X NanState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
F XueState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Y WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
L JiangBeijing Key Laboratory for Dairy Cattle Nutrition, Beijing Agricultural College, Beijing, China.
B XiongState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2773-5739
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNChina Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Science and Technology Innovation Project of Institute of Animal Sciences cxgc-ias-09-1the National Key Research and Development Plan 2016YFD0700205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study was to investigate the effect of different ratios of glucogenic to lipogenic nutrients on rumen fermentation and the corresponding ruminal bacterial communities. METHODS AND

resultsFour diets, including glucogenic diet (G), lipogenic diet (L), two mixed diets: GL1 (G: L = 2 : 1) and GL2 (G:L = 1 : 2), served as substrates and were incubated with rumen fluid in vitro. The results revealed that the gas production, dry matter digestibility and propionate proportion were significantly increased by the G diet than others. The G diet increased the bacterial genera of Succinivibrionaceae_UCG_002, Succinivibrio, Selenomonas_1 and Ruminobacter but decreased some cellulolytic bacteria including the Eubacterium and several genera in family Ruminococcaceae than others.

conclusionsWhen the glucogenic nutrient was above 1/3 of the dietary energy source among the four diets, the in vitro incubation had a higher feed digestibility and lower acetate to propionate ratio. Bacterial genera, including Selenomonas, Succinivibrio, Ruminobacter, certain genera in Ruminococcaceae, Christensenellaceae_R-7_group and Eubacterium, were more sensitive to the glucogenic to lipogenic nutrients ratio. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The present study provides a new perspective about the effect of dietary glucogenic to lipogenic ingredient ratios on rumen metabolism by comparing end-products, gas production and bacterial composition via an in vitro technique.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsBacillotaBacteriaCattleDietary SupplementsDigestionFemaleFermentationLactationNutrientsRumenSuccinivibrionaceaeNutrientsfermentationgas productionglucogenic/lipogenic nutrientsin vitroruminal bacteria

Identifiers

PMID32998176
PMCPMC8247007
OpenAlexW3091351948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.