Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997900›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

A deep learning nomogram kit for predicting metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer.

Lei Ding, Guangwei Liu, Xianxiang Zhang, Shanglong Liu, Shuai Li, Zhengdong Zhang, Yuting Guo, Yun Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei DingDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1619-9144
Guangwei LiuShandong Key Laboratory of Digital Medicine and Computer Assisted Surgery, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Xianxiang ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shanglong LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Shuai LiState Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Zhengdong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yuting GuoState Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Yun LuShandong Key Laboratory of Digital Medicine and Computer Assisted Surgery, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2253-2983
Qingdao University · CNBeihang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative diagnoses of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) by the most advanced deep learning technology of Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN) have not yet been reported. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn total, 545 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal cancer between January 2016 and March 2019 were included and were randomly allocated with a split ratio of 2:1 to the training and validation sets, respectively. The MRI images for metastatic LNs were evaluated by Faster R-CNN. Multivariate regression analyses were used to develop the predictive models. Faster R-CNN nomograms were constructed based on the multivariate analyses in the training sets and were validated in the validation sets.

resultsThe Faster R-CNN nomogram for predicting metastatic LN status contained predictors of age, metastatic LNs by Faster R-CNN and differentiation degrees of tumors, with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.816-0.909) and 0.920 (95% CI: 0.876-0.964) in the training and validation sets, respectively. The Faster R-CNN nomogram for predicting LN metastasis degree contained predictors of metastatic LNs by Faster R-CNN and differentiation degrees of tumors, with AUCs of 0.859 (95% CI: 0.804-0.913) and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.822-0.950) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration plots and decision curve analyses demonstrated good calibrations and clinical utilities. The two nomograms were used jointly as a kit for predicting metastatic LNs.

conclusionThe Faster R-CNN nomogram kit exhibits excellent performance in discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility and is convenient and reliable for predicting metastatic LNs preoperatively. CLINICAL

trial registrationChiCTR-DDD-17013842.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNomogramsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisdeep learningfaster region-based convolutional neural networklymph nodemetastasisnomogramrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID32997900
PMCPMC7724302
OpenAlexW3089376297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.