ArticleCancer medicine2020
A deep learning nomogram kit for predicting metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning and deep learning models for preoperative detection of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence based on imaging data for predicting distant metastasis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Multicenter Evaluation of a Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Model for Lymph Node Diagnosis in Rectal Cancer at MRI.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Progress in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Machine learning in metastatic cancer research: Potentials, possibilities, and prospects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Deep learning based radiomics for gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis and treatment: A minireview.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
- A narrative review on current imaging applications of artificial intelligence and radiomics in oncology: focus on the three most common cancers.La Radiologia medica · 2022Review
- AI-Model for Identifying Pathologic Myopia Based on Deep Learning Algorithms of Myopic Maculopathy Classification and "Plus" Lesion Detection in Fundus Images.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Radiomics Based on T2-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Images for Preoperative Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Nomogram for predicting the risk of bone metastasis in breast cancer: a SEER population-based study.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreoperative diagnoses of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) by the most advanced deep learning technology of Faster Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Faster R-CNN) have not yet been reported. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn total, 545 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal cancer between January 2016 and March 2019 were included and were randomly allocated with a split ratio of 2:1 to the training and validation sets, respectively. The MRI images for metastatic LNs were evaluated by Faster R-CNN. Multivariate regression analyses were used to develop the predictive models. Faster R-CNN nomograms were constructed based on the multivariate analyses in the training sets and were validated in the validation sets.
resultsThe Faster R-CNN nomogram for predicting metastatic LN status contained predictors of age, metastatic LNs by Faster R-CNN and differentiation degrees of tumors, with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.862 (95% CI: 0.816-0.909) and 0.920 (95% CI: 0.876-0.964) in the training and validation sets, respectively. The Faster R-CNN nomogram for predicting LN metastasis degree contained predictors of metastatic LNs by Faster R-CNN and differentiation degrees of tumors, with AUCs of 0.859 (95% CI: 0.804-0.913) and 0.886 (95% CI: 0.822-0.950) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Calibration plots and decision curve analyses demonstrated good calibrations and clinical utilities. The two nomograms were used jointly as a kit for predicting metastatic LNs.
conclusionThe Faster R-CNN nomogram kit exhibits excellent performance in discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility and is convenient and reliable for predicting metastatic LNs preoperatively. CLINICAL
trial registrationChiCTR-DDD-17013842.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.