Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997898›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Reducing nihilism in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Treatment, sequencing, and effects on survival outcomes.

Eileen M O'Reilly, Paul Cockrum, Andy Surinach, Zheng Wu, Allison Dillon, Kenneth H Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Beyond first line, where are we?World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eileen M O'ReillyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8076-9199
Paul CockrumIpsen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Andy SurinachGenesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0743-7219
Zheng WuGenesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Allison DillonGenesis Research, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
Kenneth H YuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4774-2672
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USIpsen (United States) · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-world practice patterns, treatment sequencing, and outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer remain unclear. Previous research indicates that the likelihood of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving or continuing cancer-directed therapy is low-a phenomenon called nihilism. This retrospective, descriptive analysis examined clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).

methodsTreatment patterns were examined using electronic health records from the Flatiron Health database covering the period from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019. Real-world overall survival [rwOS]) was compared for a subgroup of patients receiving treatment and a matched subgroup not receiving treatment.

resultsOf 7666 patients, 5687 (74.2%) received at least one line of systemic therapy. A greater proportion of patients receiving treatment than not receiving treatment had an initial diagnosis of stage IV disease (68.8% vs 61.2%, respectively). Among patients receiving an initial therapy, fewer than half (38.2%; 2174/5687) received second-line treatment, mostly because they died, and only 34.3% (745/2174) of those receiving second-line treatment advanced to third-line treatment. The rwOS for patients receiving at least one line of systemic therapy was 8.1 months versus 2.6 months for matched patients not receiving treatment (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.45; 1470 patients per group).

conclusionsSystemic therapy provided significant clinical benefit for patients who were eligible and chose to receive it, particularly when treatment was consistent with guideline recommendations. The large proportion of patients initiating treatment suggests that nihilism with mPDAC is diminishing.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Outcomeantineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocolscarcinomaelectronic health recordspancreatic ductalretrospective studiessurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID32997898
PMCPMC7666752
OpenAlexW3089805575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.