Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997831›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2020

Effects of the Neonicotinoid Acetamiprid in Pollen on Bombus impatiens Microcolony Development.

Allison A Camp, Michael A Batres, Wanda C Williams, Robert W Koethe, Kimberly A Stoner, David M Lehmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Allison A CampOak Ridge Associated Universities, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Michael A BatresOak Ridge Associated Universities, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Wanda C WilliamsCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Public Health & Integrated Toxicology Program, Cardiopulmonary & Immunotoxicology Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Robert W KoetheRegion 1 Office, Land, Chemicals and Redevelopment Division RCRA, Waste Management and Pesticides Section, US Environmental Protection Agency, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kimberly A StonerConnecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
David M LehmannCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Public Health & Environmental Systems Division, Exposure Indicators Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Oak Ridge Associated Universities · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USConnecticut Agricultural Experiment Station · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey bees and other wild bee species including bumble bees have experienced population declines in recent decades. Although many stressors are implicated in bee population declines, much attention has focused on neonicotinoid pesticides, which are widely used and known to be toxic to pollinators. One neonicotinoid, acetamiprid, has been studied very little in bumble bees, despite its use on bumble bee-pollinated crops. We assessed the impacts of acetamiprid to the North American bumble bee Bombus impatiens using the microcolony model. We examined nest growth, development, and subsequent nest productivity as measured by drone production. We found that high concentrations of acetamiprid in pollen (4520 µg/kg) significantly impacted nest growth, development, and, ultimately, reproduction (drone production). We found the no-observable-adverse effect level to be 45.2 µg/kg. Overall, acetamiprid has the potential to negatively impact reproductive endpoints for B. impatiens. However, effects occurred at concentrations substantially higher than expected environmental concentrations that would be achieved when following label rates. Further work is required to assess the effects of this pesticide on B. impatiens via alternate routes of exposure and on queenright colonies. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:2560-2569. © 2020 SETAC. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesNeonicotinoidsPesticidesPollenReproductionacetamipridNeonicotinoidsPesticidesBumble beeInvertebrate toxicologyMicrocolonyNeonicotinoidPesticidesRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID32997831
PMCPMC8086760
OpenAlexW3091437015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.