Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997803›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2021

Methylation markers FAM19A4 and miR124-2 as triage strategy for primary human papillomavirus screen positive women: A large European multicenter study.

Jesper Bonde, Arno Floore, Ditte Ejegod, Frederique J Vink, Albertus Hesselink, Peter M van de Ven, Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak, Helle Pedersen, Saskia Doorn, Wim G Quint and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Jesper BondeMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4853-6747
Arno FlooreSelf-screen B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ditte EjegodMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Frederique J VinkAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-9167
Albertus HesselinkSelf-screen B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter M van de VenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anja Oštrbenk ValenčakInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Helle PedersenMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Saskia DoornSelf-screen B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim G QuintDDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Karl Ulrich PetryDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5875-9840
Mario PoljakInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Grazyna StanczukDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Western Isles Hospital, Scotland, UK.
Kate CuschieriHPV Research Group, Division of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-3928
Silvia de SanjoséInfections and Cancer Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain.
Maaike BleekerAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes BerkhofDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris J L M MeijerSelf-screen B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniëlle A M HeidemanAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHvidovre Hospital · DKZF Screens (Netherlands) · NLUniversity of Ljubljana · SIDDL Diagnostic Laboratory · NLFraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg · DEInstitut Català d'Ornitologia · ESUniversity of Edinburgh · GBWestern Isles Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer screening, cytology is used as triage to counter the low specificity of HPV testing. VALID-SCREEN is a EU-multicenter, retrospective study conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of the FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation-based molecular triage test as a substitute or addition to cytology as reflex testing of HPV screen positive women. FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation test (QIAsure Methylation Test) was evaluated in 2384 HPV-positive cervical screening samples, from women 29-76 years of age, derived from four EU countries. Specimens were collected in ThinPrep or SurePath media, HPV-status, concurrent cytology, and histology diagnosis were provided by the parent institutes. The control population consisted of women with no evidence of disease within 2 years of follow-up. A total of 899 histologies were retrieved; 527 showed no disease, 124 CIN2 (5.2%), 228 CIN3 (9.6%) and 20 cervical cancers (0.8%); 19 of 20 screen-detected cervical cancers were found methylation-positive (sensitivity 95%). Overall specificity of FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation test was 78.3% (n = 2013; 95%CI: 76-80). The negative predictive value of hrHPV positive, methylation-negative outcomes were 99.9% for cervical cancer (N = 1694; 95%CI: 99.6-99.99), 96.9% for ≥CIN3 (95%CI: 96-98), and 93.0% for ≥CIN2 (95%CI: 92-94). Overall sensitivity for CIN3 using FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation test was 77% (n = 228; 95%CI: 71-82). CIN3 sensitivity was uniform between centers independent of sample collection medias, DNA extraction methods and HPV screening tests. Being objectively reported compared to the subjectivity of cytology, equally performing across settings and screening methods, the FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation constitute an alternative/supplement to cytology as triage method to be investigated in real-life pilot implementation.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdultAgedCytokinesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCytokinesMicroRNAsMIRN124 microRNA, humanTAFA4 protein, humanbiomarkercervical carcinomacervical screeningDNA hypermethylationhuman genome methylationhuman papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID32997803
PMCPMC7756277
OpenAlexW3090192533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.