Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997709›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Under five and infant mortality in Chile (1990-2016): Trends, disparities, and causes of death.

Ximena Aguilera, Iris Delgado, Gloria Icaza, Mauricio Apablaza, Loreto Villanueva, Carla Castillo-Laborde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Infant Mortality Trends and Determinants in Kazakhstan.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ximena AguileraCentro de Epidemiología y Políticas de Salud (CEPS), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-8153-6733
Iris DelgadoCentro de Epidemiología y Políticas de Salud (CEPS), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.
Gloria IcazaPrograma de Investigación Asociativa de Cáncer Gástrico, Instituto de Matemática y Física, Universidad de Talca, Talca, Chile.
Mauricio ApablazaFacultad de Gobierno, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1306-3791
Loreto VillanuevaDepartamento de Promoción de la Salud de la Mujer y el Recién Nacido, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Carla Castillo-LabordeCentro de Epidemiología y Políticas de Salud (CEPS), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChild health has been a health policy priority for more than a century in Chile. Since 2000, new health and intersectoral interventions have been implemented. However, no recent analyses have explored child mortality and equity in Chile, an indispensable input to guide policies towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, specially, in the context of a deeply unequal country such as many other Latin American countries. Thus, the objectives of this study are to analyze the variations in the risk and the causes of death among Chilean children aged <5 years, to identify the determinants, and to measure inequality of infant mortality from 1990 to 2016. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn observational study was conducted to analyze the Chilean children's mortality from 1990 to 2016 using under five deaths and live births data from the Vital Statistics System. To describe the variation in the risk of death, a time series analysis was performed for each of the under five mortality rate components. A comparative cause of death analysis was developed for Neonatal and 1-59 months' age groups. The determinants of infant mortality were studied with a descriptive analysis of yearly rates according to mother's and child factors and bivariate logistic regression models at the individual level. Finally, simple and complex measures of inequality at individual level were estimated considering three-year periods.

resultsRegarding under 5 mortality: (i) Child survival has improved substantially in the last three decades, with a rapid decline in under five mortality rate between 1990 and 2001, followed by a slower reduction; (ii) early neonatal mortality has become the main component of the under five mortality rate (50.6%); (iii) congenital abnormalities have positioned as the leading cause of death; (iv) an important increase in live births below 1,000 grs. Regarding infant mortality: (i) birth weight and gestational age are the two most relevant risk factors in the neonatal period, while social variables are more significant for post-neonatal mortality and, (ii) the inequality according to mother's education has shown a steady decline, with persistent inequalities in post-neonatal period.

conclusionsThe Chilean experience illustrates child health achievements and challenges in a country that transitioned from middle-to high-income in recent decades. Although inequity is one of the main challenges for the country, the health sector by granting universal access was able to reduce disparities. However, closing the gap in post-neonatal mortality is still challenging. To overcome stagnation in neonatal mortality, new and specific strategies must address current priorities, emphasizing the access of vulnerable groups.

Indexed as

Birth WeightCause of DeathChild MortalityChild, PreschoolChileCommunicable DiseasesCongenital AbnormalitiesDatabases, FactualFemaleGestational AgeHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID32997709
PMCPMC7526984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.