Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997687›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Mortality risk of antipsychotic augmentation for adult depression.

Tobias Gerhard, T Scott Stroup, Christoph U Correll, Soko Setoguchi, Brian L Strom, Cecilia Huang, Zhiqiang Tan, Stephen Crystal, Mark Olfson

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Perspectives in Psychopharmacology.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tobias GerhardCenter for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8598-5771
T Scott StroupDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States of America.
Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, United States of America.
Soko SetoguchiCenter for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Brian L StromCenter for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Cecilia HuangCenter for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research; Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Zhiqiang TanDepartment of Statistics and Biostatistics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, United States of America.
Stephen CrystalCenter for Health Services Research on Pharmacotherapy, Chronic Disease Management, and Outcomes, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States of America.
Mark OlfsonDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, United States of America.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USNew York State Psychiatric InstituteHofstra University · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
Safety of Second Generation Antipsychotics for Adult DepressionR21MH102724 · NIMH · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI GERHARD, TOBIAS · 2014 to 2015
$426k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH102724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceRandomized controlled trials have demonstrated increased all-cause mortality in elderly patients with dementia treated with newer antipsychotics. It is unknown whether this risk generalizes to non-elderly adults using newer antipsychotics as augmentation treatment for depression.

objectiveThis study examined all-cause mortality risk of newer antipsychotic augmentation for adult depression.

designPopulation-based new-user/active comparator cohort study.

settingNational healthcare claims data from the US Medicaid program from 2001-2010 linked to the National Death Index.

participantsNon-elderly adults (25-64 years) diagnosed with depression who after ≥3 months of antidepressant monotherapy initiated either augmentation with a newer antipsychotic or with a second antidepressant. Patients with alternative indications for antipsychotic medications, such as schizophrenia, psychotic depression, or bipolar disorder, were excluded. EXPOSURE: Augmentation treatment for depression with a newer antipsychotic or with a second antidepressant. MAIN OUTCOME: All-cause mortality during study follow-up ascertained from the National Death Index.

resultsThe analytic cohort included 39,582 patients (female = 78.5%, mean age = 44.5 years) who initiated augmentation with a newer antipsychotic (n = 22,410; 40% = quetiapine, 21% = risperidone, 17% = aripiprazole, 16% = olanzapine) or with a second antidepressant (n = 17,172). The median chlorpromazine equivalent starting dose for all newer antipsychotics was 68mg/d, increasing to 100 mg/d during follow-up. Altogether, 153 patients died during 13,328 person-years of follow-up (newer antipsychotic augmentation: n = 105, follow-up = 7,601 person-years, mortality rate = 138.1/10,000 person-years; antidepressant augmentation: n = 48, follow-up = 5,727 person-years, mortality rate = 83.8/10,000 person-years). An adjusted hazard ratio of 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 2.06) indicated increased all-cause mortality risk for newer antipsychotic augmentation compared to antidepressant augmentation (risk difference = 37.7 (95%CI, 1.7 to 88.8) per 10,000 person-years). Results were robust across several sensitivity analyses.

conclusionAugmentation with newer antipsychotics in non-elderly patients with depression was associated with increased mortality risk compared with adding a second antidepressant. Though these findings require replication and cannot prove causality, physicians managing adults with depression should be aware of this potential for increased mortality associated with newer antipsychotic augmentation.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic AgentsCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAntidepressive AgentsAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID32997687
PMCPMC7526884
OpenAlexW3089353129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.