ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2021
Predicting and Monitoring Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Outcomes Using Clinical and Wearable Sensor Data in Brain Injury Survivors.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Inertial Measurement Units in Medicine: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic data management for effective AI-driven decision support systems in robotic rehabilitation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Trends and Innovations in Wearable Technology for Motor Rehabilitation, Prediction, and Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Inertial Measurement Unit-Based Frozen Shoulder Identification from Daily Shoulder Tasks Using Machine Learning Approaches.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AI Applications in Adult Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review Using AI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Wearable-Based Kinematic Analysis of Upper-Limb Movements During Daily Activities Could Provide Insights into Stroke Survivors' Motor Ability.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2024Article
- Regression-Based Machine Learning for Predicting Lifting Movement Pattern Change in People with Low Back Pain.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Early Prediction of Poststroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Using Wearable Sensors.Physical therapy · 2024Article
- Leveraging Emerging Technologies to Expand Accessibility and Improve Precision in Rehabilitation and Exercise for People with Disabilities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Review
- Muscle synergies for evaluating upper limb in clinical applications: A systematic review.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Improvement of predictive accuracies of functional outcomes after subacute stroke inpatient rehabilitation by machine learning models.PloS one · 2023Article
- ARMIA: A Sensorized Arm Wearable for Motor Rehabilitation.Biosensors · 2022Article
- IMU-Based Monitoring for Assistive Diagnosis and Management of IoHT: A Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- GPS and Smartphone Technology for Real-World Measurement of Community Mobility in Healthcare.Digital biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRehabilitation specialists have shown considerable interest for the development of models, based on clinical data, to predict the response to rehabilitation interventions in stroke and traumatic brain injury survivors. However, accurate predictions are difficult to obtain due to the variability in patients' response to rehabilitation interventions. This study aimed to investigate the use of wearable technology in combination with clinical data to predict and monitor the recovery process and assess the responsiveness to treatment on an individual basis.
methodsGaussian Process Regression-based algorithms were developed to estimate rehabilitation outcomes (i.e., Functional Ability Scale scores) using either clinical or wearable sensor data or a combination of the two.
resultsThe algorithm based on clinical data predicted rehabilitation outcomes with a Pearson's correlation of 0.79 compared to actual clinical scores provided by clinicians but failed to model the variability in responsiveness to the intervention observed across individuals. In contrast, the algorithm based on wearable sensor data generated rehabilitation outcome estimates with a Pearson's correlation of 0.91 and modeled the individual responses to rehabilitation more accurately. Furthermore, we developed a novel approach to combine estimates derived from the clinical data and the sensor data using a constrained linear model. This approach resulted in a Pearson's correlation of 0.94 between estimated and clinician-provided scores.
conclusionThis algorithm could enable the design of patient-specific interventions based on predictions of rehabilitation outcomes relying on clinical and wearable sensor data. SIGNIFICANCE: This is important in the context of developing precision rehabilitation interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.