ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2020
Online control of reach accuracy in mice.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavioral correlates of Purkinje cell ensemble covariance.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A paradigm for skilled forelimb reaching by head-restrained mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Developmental molecular signatures define de novo cortico-brainstem circuit for skilled forelimb movement.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A transparent wheel-based platform for locomotion-on-demand and multi-view body and facial kinematics in head-fixed mice.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- High-resolution in vivo kinematic tracking with customized injectable fluorescent nanoparticles.Science advances · 2025Article
- Accurate Tracking of Locomotory Kinematics in Mice Moving Freely in Three-Dimensional Environments.eNeuro · 2025Article
- A novel biomechanical model of the proximal mouse forelimb predicts muscle activity in optimal control simulations of reaching movements.Journal of neurophysiology · 2025Article
- MODELING TRAJECTORIES USING FUNCTIONAL LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Sensorimotor content of multi-unit activity recorded in the paramedian lobule of the cerebellum using carbon fiber microelectrode arrays.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Cerebellar associative learning underlies skilled reach adaptation.Nature neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- A dystonia mouse model with motor and sequencing deficits paralleling human disease.Behavioural brain research · 2022Article
- New roles for dopamine in motor skill acquisition: lessons from primates, rodents, and songbirds.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reaching movements, as a basic yet complex motor behavior, are a foundational model system in neuroscience. In particular, there has been a significant recent expansion of investigation into the neural circuit mechanisms of reach behavior in mice. Nevertheless, quantification of mouse reach kinematics remains lacking, limiting comparison to the primate literature. In this study, we quantitatively demonstrate the homology of mouse reach kinematics to primate reach and also discover novel late-phase correlational structure that implies online control. Overall, our results highlight the decelerative phase of reach as important in driving successful outcome. Specifically, we develop and implement a novel statistical machine-learning algorithm to identify kinematic features associated with successful reaches and find that late-phase kinematics are most predictive of outcome, signifying online reach control as opposed to preplanning. Moreover, we identify and characterize late-phase kinematic adjustments that are yoked to midflight position and velocity of the limb, allowing for dynamic correction of initial variability, with head-fixed reaches being less dependent on position in comparison to freely behaving reaches. Furthermore, consecutive reaches exhibit positional error correction but not hot-handedness, implying opponent regulation of motor variability. Overall, our results establish foundational mouse reach kinematics in the context of neuroscientific investigation, characterizing mouse reach production as an active process that relies on dynamic online control mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.