Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997429›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2020

Regeneration of Burnt Bridges on a DNA Catenane Walker.

Julián Valero, Michael Famulok

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. DNA Walkers for Biosensing Development.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Regeneration of Burnt Bridges on a DNA Catenane Walker.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Julián ValeroLIMES Chemical Biology Unit, Universität Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Straße 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5260-2770
Michael FamulokLIMES Chemical Biology Unit, Universität Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Straße 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5878-6577
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA walkers are molecular machines that can move with high precision onthe nanoscale due to their structural and functional programmability. Despite recent advances in the field that allow exploring different energy sources, stimuli, and mechanisms of action for these nanomachines, the continuous operation and reusability of DNA walkers remains challenging because in most cases the steps, once taken by the walker, cannot be taken again. Herein we report the path regeneration of a burnt-bridges DNA catenane walker using RNase A. This walker uses a T7RNA polymerase that produces long RNA transcripts to hybridize to the path and move forward while the RNA remains hybridized to the path and blocks it for an additional walking cycle. We show that RNA degradation triggered by RNase A restores the path and returns the walker to the initial position. RNase inhibition restarts the function of the walker.

Indexed as

Bacteriophage T7DNA, CatenatedDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesNanotechnologyNucleic Acid HybridizationRibonuclease, PancreaticRNAViral Proteinsbacteriophage T7 RNA polymeraseDNA, CatenatedDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRibonuclease, PancreaticRNAViral ProteinsbiohybridsDNA catenane walkersDNA nanotechnologymolecular machines

Identifiers

PMID32997429
PMCPMC7540537
OpenAlexW3035973002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.