ArticleClinical and translational medicine2020
Response of patients with chest tightness variant asthma with routine asthma treatment regimen: A 1-year multicenter, prospective, real-world study.
Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary function and risk factors in pediatric chest tightness variant asthma: a case-control study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Small airway inflammation in atypical asthma.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Research progress on the pathogenesis of chest tightness variant asthma characterized by chest tightness.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024Review
- Perspectives and Management of Atypical Asthma in Chinese Specialists and Primary Care Practitioners-A Nationwide Questionnaire Survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAsthmatic patients with chest tightness as their only presenting symptom (chest tightness variant asthma [CTVA]) have clinical characteristics of eosinophilic airway inflammation similar to those of classic asthma (CA); however, whether CTVA has similar response to antiasthma treatment as compared with CA remains unclear.
objectiveThe response of 76 CTVA patients to standard asthma treatments with inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting beta-agonists was explored in a 52-week multicenter, prospective, real-world study.
resultsAfter 52 weeks of treatment with therapy regimens used for CA, the mean 5-point Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score decreased markedly from 1.38(first administration) to 0.71 (52 weeks, mean decrease: 0.674, 95%CI: 0.447-0.900, P<.001).The mean asthma quality-of-life questionnaire (AQLQ) score increased from 5.77 (first administration) to 6.20 (52 weeks, mean increase: 0.441, 95% CI 0.258-0.625, P<.001). Furthermore, at week 52, FVC, FEV
conclusionIn conclusion, patients with CTVA had a good therapeutic response to the guideline-recommended routine treatment (containing inhaled corticosteroids). The association between the treatment response and the severity of CTVA suggested that CTVA patients with higher ACQ-5 scores had better therapeutic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.