Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997319›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2021

Knowing, relationships and trust-citizens' perceptions of whole genome sequencing for the Genetics Clinic of the Future.

Simone Schumann, Brigitte Gschmeidler, Giuseppe Pellegrini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06441981 (Closing the Gap in Public Perception and Policy for SARS-CoV-2 Whole Genome Sequencing and Genomics for All), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06441981 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Closing the Gap in Public Perception and Policy for SARS-CoV-2 Whole Genome Sequencing and Genomics for All

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled800ConditionsKnowledge, Attitudes, PracticeArmsEducation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Maternal perspectives on sharing newborn genomic data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone SchumannOpen Science - Life Sciences in Dialogue, Vienna, Austria. schumann@openscience.or.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7785-0984
Brigitte GschmeidlerOpen Science - Life Sciences in Dialogue, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2440-1306
Giuseppe PellegriniObserva - Science in Society, Vicenza, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-3177
Observa Science in Society · ITOpen Society · CZ

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur bmbwf-10240/0007-V/3c/2018H2020 Health 643439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this article is to present various views from different groups of citizens on the topic of whole genome sequencing (WGS). Sixteen focus groups were carried out in Italy and Austria which aimed at reflecting on the question of how to ensure that the implementation of WGS into the clinic is relevant and responsive to the needs of all members of society. In the qualitative analysis of the focus groups, three key themes (knowing, relationships and trust) were investigated. Although the majority of the participants favoured a person-centred care approach, we also found more radical perspectives in the relationship theme. This includes a self-centred orientation in which health care institutions should be prepared to integrate self-interpretation efforts of citizens and develop strategies to deal with them. Different attitudes towards getting to know genetic information (knowing) and varied approaches to decision-making for or against the use of WGS were observed. Personal capacities, in particular those to handle medical information, were emphasized as key factors. This means that it is important not to connect the desire not to know with a rejection of the technology per se but rather to support information and consultancy processes that effectively involve citizens. Concerning the third theme, we have underlined the important role of mistrust in addition to trust because it mostly points to areas or conditions considered problematic. Thus, mistrust is also a way to articulate critique, for example, of the profit-making with patient data, that has to be taken seriously by governance.

Indexed as

Focus groupsPublic engagementPublic perceptionsWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32997319
PMCPMC7846639
OpenAlexW3090643271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.