ArticleJournal of neurology2021
Action fluency identifies different sex, age, global cognition, executive function and brain activation profile in non-demented patients with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brief tests for the assessment of language-executive functions: normative data for the Italian population.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Speech's syllabic rhythm and articulatory features produced under different auditory feedback conditions identify Parkinsonism.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Association between Cognitive Impairment and Freezing of Gait in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Predictive language comprehension in Parkinson's disease.PloS one · 2023Article
- Semantic Recollection in Parkinson's Disease: Functional Reconfiguration and MAPT Variants.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Action Fluency in Parkinson's Disease: A Mini-Review and Viewpoint.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have difficulties processing action words, which could be related to early cognitive decline. The action fluency test can be used to quickly and easily assess the processing of action words in PD. The goal of this study was to characterize how the action fluency test relates to personal characteristics, disease factors, cognition, and neural activity in PD. Forty-eight participants with PD (34 male, 14 female) and 35 control participants (16 male, 19 female) completed functional neuroimaging using a set-shifting task and a neuropsychological assessment including the action fluency test. PD participants with a score one standard deviation below the norm or lower on the action fluency test were identified. All PD participants with poor performance (PD-P, n = 15) were male. They were compared to male PD participants with scores within the normal range (PD-N, n = 19) and male healthy controls (HC, n = 16). PD-P were older, had lower global cognition scores, lower executive functions scores, and decreased activity in fronto-temporal regions compared with PD-N. There was no difference between the two PD groups in terms of the duration of the disease, dose of dopaminergic medication, and severity of motor symptoms. PD-N were younger than HC, but there was no other significant difference between these groups. The action fluency test identified a subgroup of PD patients with distinct sex, age, global cognition, executive functions, and brain activity characteristics. Implications for the evaluation of cognition are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.