Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997282›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

REALMS study: real-world effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Portugal.

S Batista, C C Nunes, J J Cerqueira, Ana Martins Silva, J Correia de Sá, J Ferreira, M T Mendonça, J Pinheiro, V Salgado, A S Correia and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

S Batista *Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal. soniarmbatista@chuc.min-saude.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6081-6955
C C Nunes *Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
J J CerqueiraHospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Ana Martins SilvaCentro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
J Correia de SáCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte E.P.E., Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
J FerreiraCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte E.P.E., Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.
M T MendonçaCentro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal.
J PinheiroCentro Hospitalar Vila Nova Gaia, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
V SalgadoHospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca E.P.E., Amadora, Portugal.
A S CorreiaCentro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental E.P.E., Hospital de Egas Moniz, Lisbon, Portugal.
J SequeiraCentro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central E.P.E., Hospital Santo António dos Capuchos, Lisbon, Portugal.
A CostaNovartis Farma, Lisbon, Portugal.
L SousaCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075, Coimbra, Portugal.
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte · PTCentro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia · PTHospital Braga · PTHospital de Egas Moniz · PTHospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca · PTHospital Santo António dos Capuchos · PTUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFingolimod, an oral sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator, is approved by EMA for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of fingolimod in patients with RRMS in real-world clinical practice in Portugal.

methodsRetrospective, multicentre, non-interventional study, reporting 3 years follow-up of data collected from October 2015 to July 2016. Sociodemographic data and previous treatments at baseline and data regarding disease evolution, including number of relapses, annualised relapse rates (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), were collected.

resultsTwo-hundred and seventy-five participants were enrolled in the REALMS study. Results showed that the main reason to switch to fingolimod was failure of previous treatment (56.7%) and only 3.6% were naïve patients. In the total population, there was a significant decrease in ARR of 64.6% in the first year of treatment, 79.7% in the second year and 82.3% in the third year, compared with baseline. More than 67.0% of patients had no relapses during the 3 years after switching to fingolimod. EDSS remained stable throughout the study.

conclusionsTherapy with fingolimod showed a sustained effectiveness and safety over the 3 years, particularly on patients switched from first-line drugs (BRACE). No new safety issues were reported.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsPortugalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeFingolimod HydrochlorideImmunosuppressive AgentsARREDSSFingolimodReal-world studyRelapsing-remitting multiple sclerosisSafety

Identifiers

PMID32997282
PMCPMC8043899
OpenAlexW3090528367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.