ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2020
The methyl
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From molecular descriptions to cellular functions of intrinsically disordered protein regions.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Mixture-Based Screening of Focused Combinatorial Libraries by NMR: Application to the Antiapoptotic Protein hMcl-1.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2023Article
- p53 Transactivation Domain Mediates Binding and Phase Separation with Poly-PR/GR.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- NMR illuminates intrinsic disorder.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many proteins interact with their ligand proteins by recognition of short linear motifs that are often intrinsically disordered. These interactions are usually weak and are characterized by fast exchange. NMR spectroscopy is a powerful tool to study weak interactions. The methods that have been commonly used are analysis of chemicals shift perturbations (CSP) upon ligand binding and saturation transfer difference spectroscopy. These two methods identify residues at the binding interface between the protein and its ligand. In the present study, we used a combination of transferred-NOE, specific methyl-labeling and an optimized isotope-edited/isotope-filtered NOESY experiment to study specific interactions between the 42 kDa p38α mitogen-activated protein kinase and the kinase interaction motif (KIM) on the STEP phosphatase. These measurements distinguished between residues that both exhibit CSPs upon ligand binding and interact with the KIM peptide from residues that exhibit CSPs but do not interact with the peptide. In addition, these results provide information about pairwise interactions that is important for a more reliable docking of the KIM peptide into its interacting surface on p38α. This combination of techniques should be applicable for many protein-peptide complexes up to 80 kDa for which methyl resonance assignment can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32997264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.