Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997262›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of urology2021

A prospective multicenter randomized comparison between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (ThuLEP).

Giorgio Bozzini, Lorenzo Berti, Tahsin Batuhan Aydoğan, Matteo Maltagliati, Jean Baptiste Roche, Pierluigi Bove, Umberto Besana, Alberto Calori, Antonio Luigi Pastore, Alexander Müller and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07456345 (Evaluation of the Impact of Preoperative Pelvic Floor Exercise on Incontinence After Laser Enucleation of the Prostate), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07456345 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Impact of Preoperative Pelvic Floor Exercise on Incontinence After Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: a Prospective Feasibility Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsBPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia), Incontinence, Urinary, HoLEP, Pelvic Floor Muscle ExerciseArmsPelvic Floor Muscle Exercise before and after surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Giorgio BozziniDepartment of Urology, ASST Valle Olona, Ospedale di Busto Arsizio (VA), Busto Arsizio, Italy. gioboz@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-314X
Lorenzo BertiDepartment of Urology, ASST Valle Olona, Ospedale di Busto Arsizio (VA), Busto Arsizio, Italy.
Tahsin Batuhan AydoğanDepartment of Urology, Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (MO), Modena, Italy.
Matteo MaltagliatiDepartment of Urology, ASST Valle Olona, Ospedale di Busto Arsizio (VA), Busto Arsizio, Italy.
Jean Baptiste RocheDepartment of Urology, Clinique Saint Augustin, Bordeaux, France.
Pierluigi BoveDepartment of Urology, Ospedale San Carlo di Nancy, Roma, Italy.
Umberto BesanaDepartment of Urology, ASST Valle Olona, Ospedale di Busto Arsizio (VA), Busto Arsizio, Italy.
Alberto CaloriDepartment of Urology, ASST Valle Olona, Ospedale di Busto Arsizio (VA), Busto Arsizio, Italy.
Antonio Luigi PastoreDepartment of Urology, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza, ICOT (LT), Rome, Italy.
Alexander MüllerDepartment of Urology, Spital Limmattal, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Salvatore MicaliDepartment of Urology, Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (MO), Modena, Italy.
Maria Chiara SighinolfiDepartment of Urology, Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (MO), Modena, Italy.
Bernardo RoccoDepartment of Urology, Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia (MO), Modena, Italy.
Carlo BuizzaDepartment of Urology, ASST Valle Olona, Ospedale di Busto Arsizio (VA), Busto Arsizio, Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITOspedale di Circolo di Busto Arsizio · ITClinique du Sport · FREuropean Association of Urology · NLOspedale San Carlo · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITSpital Limmattal · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare intra and perioperative parameters between HoLEP and ThuLEP in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes of the two procedures with a 12-month follow-up.

methodsA prospective randomized study was performed on 236 consecutive patients who underwent ThuLEP (n = 115), or HoLEP (n = 121) in three different centers. Intra and perioperative parameters were analyzed: operative time, enucleated tissue weight, irrigation volume, blood loss, catheterization time, hospital stay and complications. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 3 and 12 months postoperatively with the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), the quality of life (QoL) score, post-void residual volume (PVR), PSA and maximum flow rate (Q

resultsPreoperative variables in each study arm did not show any significant difference. Compared to HoLEP, ThuLEP showed similar operative time (63.69 vs 71.66 min, p = 0.245), enucleated tissue weight (48.84 vs 51.13 g, p = 0.321), catheterization time (1.9 vs 2.0 days, p = 0.450) and hospital stay (2.2 vs 2.8 days, p = 0.216), but resulted in less haemoglobin decrease (0.45 vs 2.77 g/dL, p = 0.005). HoLEP presented a significantly higher number of patients with postoperative acute urinary retention and stress incontinence. No significant differences were found in PSA, Q

conclusionThuLEP and HoLEP both relieved lower urinary tract symptoms equally, with high efficacy and safety. ThuLEP detemined reduced blood loss and early postoperative complications. Catheterization time, enucleated tissue, hospital stay, operative time and follow-up parameters did not show any significant difference.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFollow-Up StudiesHumansLasers, Solid-StateMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstatectomyProstatic HyperplasiaThuliumThuliumBenign prostatic hyperplasiaEndoscopicEndourologyEnucleation of the prostateHoLEPHolmiumLaserLower urinary tract symptomsThuLEPThulium

Identifiers

PMID32997262
OpenAlexW3089342280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.