ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2021
[The method of "town hall talks": a study protocol].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implementation behavior of communities regarding relatives caring for people with dementia : A quantitative study among German communities.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2024Article
- Development and Psychometric Properties of the Community Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (CIBQ) in the Context of Supporting Caring Relatives of People with Dementia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Community support for caring relatives of people with dementia: qualitative analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimSociety is responsible for strengthening "caregiver-sensitive" communities based on the principle of social services to the public and are thus oriented towards the appreciation of caring relatives (CR) of people with dementia (PwD), their capability for self-care and participation. This requires methods to emphasize the social value of informal care and to re-evaluate existing support services. The article aims to present the method of "town hall talks".
methodIn 20 communities throughout Germany a public town hall talk in which CR, actors in the community (AC) and the citizens enter into a dialogue, was conducted. In three moderated discussion groups the question of communal responsibility for the provision of resources was addressed. These resources should encourage the CR ability of self-care as well as strategies for their support. In order to make a statement regarding the success of the project planning, three pilot town hall talks were evaluated. PREVIOUS
resultsThe recruitment of the population sample and the organization of the town hall talks in particular are administratively and logistically challenging. The project can only be successful through networking and intensive cooperation between scientists and the communities. In terms of content and logistics, the project planning of the pilot town hall talks was successful. The method received excellent ratings from the majority of the CR and AC.
conclusionRegarding the creation of caregiver-sensitive communities the town hall talks promise great potential. The specific benefit of the method for the CR and the community will be examined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.