Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32997156›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2020

Comparison of different bone graft with arthroscopy-assisted arthrodesis for the treatment of traumatic arthritis of the subtalar joint.

Junming Wan, Liangle Liu, Yuqing Zeng, Haiyong Ren, Shuliang Zhang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Studies of Bone Graft and Orthobiologics for Foot Ankle Arthrodesis: A Critical Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junming WanDepartment of joint surgery, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yet-sun University, No. 628 Zhenyuan road, Shenzhen, 518107, Guangdong, China. doctorwan@i.smu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3723-9173
Liangle LiuZhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Yuqing ZengDepartment of joint surgery, Tongde hospital of Zhejiang province, Hangzhou, 310002, Zhejiang, China.
Haiyong RenDepartment of joint surgery, Tongde hospital of Zhejiang province, Hangzhou, 310002, Zhejiang, China.
Shuliang ZhangDepartment of joint surgery, Tongde hospital of Zhejiang province, Hangzhou, 310002, Zhejiang, China. hztree78@163.com.
Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNZhujiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyTo compare the clinical outcomes of traumatic arthritis of the subtalar joint treated by arthroscopy-assisted arthrodesis with autologous bone graft, allogenous bone graft, artifical bone graft, and no bone graft .

methodsSixty-two patients (64 ft) with traumatic arthritis of subtalar joint were randomly divided into four groups. The cases treated with arthroscopy-assisted arthrodesis were analyzed retrospectively. The mean follow-up time was about 22 months (18-28 months) in each group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and radiographic examination. The post-operative complications in each group were recorded respectively.

resultsAll operations were successful, without incision complications. The subtalar joint obtained full osseous fusion in each group. The average time of osseous fusion was about 12 weeks. There was no significant difference in the fusion time with each group (P = 0.991). The AOFAS and VAS scores in each group were improved significantly in the pre-operative vs post-operative evaluation (all P < 0.01). The average operation time in autologous bone graft group was 74.56 ± 11.45 min which significantly different from that of other groups(P < 0.01).

conclusionSimilar clinical outcomes were achieved among each type of bone graft. Therefore, which types of bone graft or not may be not the most important for arthroscopy-assisted subtalar arthrodesis.

Indexed as

ArthritisSubtalar JointArthrodesisArthroscopyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArthrodesisArthroscopyBone graftSubtalar jointTraumatic arthritis

Identifiers

PMID32997156
OpenAlexW3091300464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.